wfumike02
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2011
- Messages
- 3,896
- Reaction score
- 232
That makes sense. That is, an inspection in one's car is not as intrusive as an inspection of one's home. But, is the degree of that intrusion not influenced by the concept that driving is a privilege?
Not so much that as the fact that driving is a public activity and therefore there is a lesser expectation of privacy. Driving being a privilege is more a factor when you get into implied consent.
What if you told them you would be glad to park anywhere they wanted and would be willing to wait for them to get a warrant to take the sample?
They would probably tell you that the courts have said they don't need one.