Pretty strongly disagree with this, which is odd considering you have Tiger in your name...
First the putting comment is pretty nuts. Jordan didn't even lead the tour in strokes gained putting last year (and was barely top 10 the year before), and Tiger has multiple years of better putting performances than Jordan even when he was declining. Jordan's a great putter, but his putting gets extra attention because he's not that long. The distance comment is pretty wrong as well - Tiger averaged 316 yards 12 years ago. That would have been #1 on tour last year by 2 yards. And that's despite the decade of equipment improvement between then and now. And that year he was top 5 in putting.
It's extremely tricky to start playing the game of how DJ/Day/Rory/Spieth compare to Tiger going up against Phil, Stricker, Els, Vijay, Scott, Donald, Goosen, Sergio in their primes. It looked like we were headed toward a new level with Rory, Day, and DJ, but they've all faltered and battled injuries and struggled in a way Tiger never did at that age. Bottom line is Tiger had a 3.3 stroke scoring advantage over the field in 2006. The closest anyone has ever come to that since Tiger's decline started was Rory in 2012 at 2.4... And Tiger was 2nd at 2.3. Multiple years of averaging 3+ strokes on the field is insane and nobody is touching that these days. And while you can make an argument that in 2000 the PGA Tour wasn't as deep as it is now, that's certainly not significantly true compared to 2012/13.
At best, a few players today are occasionally playing almost as well as Tiger Woods at his peak. But there have been a bunch of tournaments with pretty poor endings, choking down the stretch, guys winning with their B games, and disappointing performances from the big names.
It's nice to have some deep elite talent at the top of the tour, but just when one of that group seems like their sniffing a period of dominance they falter. First Rory, then Day, now DJ.