No American Secretary of state has been successful in the Middle East. The Libya, Syria, Egypt and Tunisia revolutions were all the result of George Bush's blessed Arab Spring, which was doomed to failure before it started. These "countries" were created in the post WWI period when the victors in Europe carved up the Ottoman empire and the German over seas holdings. The carvers ignored religious and ethnic spatial distributions and just created some countries (see the link below). The countries only persisted as long they did because each one had a dictatorial system of government that brutally suppressed any opposition, e.g. Iraq. Removing Saddam Hussein was the dumbest foreign policy move since the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. The suppressed populations throughout the middle east thought that the US and Britain would come to help them topple their own dictators after they heard about what happened in Iraq, however it has all completely backfired. Iraq, Syria and Libya are a mess, Egypt is in the hands of religious zealots and I am not up to date on Tunisia. Blaming Obama and, as Sailor was, Clinton, for the problems in Iraq, Syria, Libya and with ISIS and not Bush is like when my daughter blames me for the stain in the carpet when cat the pukes. I can accept that Obama and his team have not handled it very well at times, but seriously, the Middle East has been mishandled by the west for over a century, but really, at least since the crusades.
http://www.cc.com/video-clips/kovgs5/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-sir-archibald-mapsalot-iii