Rather than once again listing the positions into which her husband's political career has propelled her, maybe the Atlantic would do well to concentrate on the abysmal quality and results of her decision making in those positions. The only sure things with Hillary are lies, corruption, and poor decision making. Look at the record.
Rather than engaging in yet another left-liberal and corporate elite inspired invective against the Donald, maybe the Atlantic would do better to try to come to grips with the very real shortcomings and failures of the Democratic Party's elitist left-liberal ideology and the unholy alliance of the modern western left with international corporate greed to which the Trump candidacy is a rather imperfect and frustrated response. As bsf has pointed out, at least the Donald is right about two things: trade and immigration. The Atlantic would do well to notice.
As far as the quality of their endorsements are concerned, the Atlantic appears to show a serious intellectual and moral decline and reveals a steady downward spiral in the levels of corruption these endorsed candidates represent. Lincoln was not particularly corrupt; Johnson much more so; while Hillary is hopelessly compromised. In terms of competence, Hillary Clinton is an arrogant, excessively ambitious political incompetent kept afloat by a cynical corporate and financial entourage and its media mouthpieces that hope to capitalize on her prospective presidency. Lincoln and Johnson were skillful politicians.
