ImTheCaptain
I disagree with you
junebug's fun new premise: metaphor is unworkable as a human language concept
junebug's fun new premise: metaphor is unworkable as a human language concept
Oops indeed. Schumer admits he should not have used the words he did.
But don’t let me stop you all from defending the indefensible.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/05/politics/senate-republicans-chuck-schumer/index.html
Oops indeed. Schumer admits he should not have used the words he did.
But don’t let me stop you all from defending the indefensible.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/05/politics/senate-republicans-chuck-schumer/index.html
As I stated, Schumer’s statement could reasonably interpreted to incite violence, whether that was his intent or not. This isn’t a close question, and Schumer should apologize. He won’t, just like Trump didn’t for his statement about “Obama judges.”
That’s just where we are with political discourse in this country today, and everyone digs in for anything said or done by those in their party.
Oops indeed. Schumer admits he should not have used the words he did.
But don’t let me stop you all from defending the indefensible.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/05/politics/senate-republicans-chuck-schumer/index.html
Nobody has a problem with using the metaphor of a whirlwind, you moron. It’s the “you will pay the price” and the “hit” language while calling out Justices by name that is the problem.
Also, I was against BK’s confirmation, but don’t let the FACTS get in the way.
Nobody has a problem with using the metaphor of a whirlwind, you moron. It’s the “you will pay the price” and the “hit” language while calling out Justices by name that is the problem.
Also, I was against BK’s confirmation, but don’t let the FACTS get in the way.
Seems more of a, I shouldn’t have said what I said because you could misinterpret it and I now I have the pleasure of dealing with you hyperventilating rubes.
Hmm, maybe the link was broken? I’ll try it again:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/05/politics/senate-republicans-chuck-schumer/index.html
Schumer admitted he shouldn’t have said what he did, you nitwits.
I would have thought it was implicit when I said that Senators shouldn’t use words that can reasonably be interpreted to incite violence that I was acknowledging there were other meanings of those words.
Nobody has a problem with using the metaphor of a whirlwind, you moron. It’s the “you will pay the price” and the “hit” language while calling out Justices by name that is the problem.
Also, I was against BK’s confirmation, but don’t let the FACTS get in the way.
Kavanaugh said the country would reap the whirlwind. Reap means to "cut and gather" (https://www.google.com/search?q=rea...69i61j69i60.1791j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8) so he must have been threatening to cut the country and then gather us all up...maybe mass graves?...I'm not certain. Pretty threaten language though. I'd rather be hit than cut...personal opinion, I guess, but I just don't like blood.
MAYBE (was that obvious enough) Junebug's law degree should be revoked.