ImTheCaptain
I disagree with you
[without having a brilliant alternative, before you ask] i think the current state of affairs and the future arc is a fair argument for limiting direct elections
i think the current state of affairs and the future arc is a fair argument for limiting direct elections
Good luck getting two-thirds of both houses of congress or two-thirds of all state legislatures to agree on anything period in 2018. The chances of the Constitution being amended any time soon on any topic is slim to none. It's a totally different conversation, but amending the Constitution was meant to be a difficult and deliberate task, but not an impossible one. It's essentially an impossibility in 2018.
I'm personally all on board with an oligarchy but the SwissChalet's of the world would never embrace that as any thing other than elitist snobbery.
Good luck getting two-thirds of both houses of congress or two-thirds of all state legislatures to agree on anything period in 2018. The chances of the Constitution being amended any time soon on any topic is slim to none. It's a totally different conversation, but amending the Constitution was meant to be a difficult and deliberate task, but not an impossible one. It's essentially an impossibility in 2018.
So, if the democrats get both houses and the presidency and the conservative Supreme Court starts overturning their legislative agenda.... will they be the new “activist” judges?
Good luck getting two-thirds of both houses of congress or two-thirds of all state legislatures to agree on anything period in 2018. The chances of the Constitution being amended any time soon on any topic is slim to none. It's a totally different conversation, but amending the Constitution was meant to be a difficult and deliberate task, but not an impossible one. It's essentially an impossibility in 2018.
I think that's the end game for conservatives. Even if they do lose their congressional majority and the presidency in the new few elections, they could still effectively block any new progressive measures via the SC and lower federal courts, if they can appoint enough judges to control them. So, they win no matter what the voters ultimately decide.
So, if the democrats get both houses and the presidency and the conservative Supreme Court starts overturning their legislative agenda.... will they be the new “activist” judges?
Most judges cover a certain geographic area, correct? Would only be fair for them to be 90% conservative then.
Most judges cover a certain geographic area, correct? Would only be fair for them to be 90% conservative then.
“Say hello to your boy,” Mr. Trump said. “Special guy.”
Mr. Trump was apparently referring to Justice Kennedy’s son, Justin. The younger Mr. Kennedy spent more than a decade at Deutsche Bank, eventually rising to become the bank’s global head of real estate capital markets, and he worked closely with Mr. Trump when he was a real estate developer, according to two people with knowledge of his role.
During Mr. Kennedy’s tenure, Deutsche Bank became Mr. Trump’s most important lender, dispensing well over $1 billion in loans to him for the renovation and construction of skyscrapers in New York and Chicago at a time other mainstream banks were wary of doing business with him because of his troubled business history.