DistrictDeacon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2011
- Messages
- 13,054
- Reaction score
- 1,068
Justice Ginsburg with her characteristic pithiness used this to describe how a nominee should comport herself at a hearing. No hints, no previews, no forecasts. That had been the practice of nominees before her. But everybody calls it the Ginsburg rule because she stated it so concisely.
Are you illiterate?
RBG plainly and clearly said she believed in the woman’s right to choose. Barrett wouldn’t even acknowledge that climate change is real or that the President can’t unilaterally change the date of the election.