WakeandBake
Well-known member
too bad cause I said 'surviving' not 'thriving.' I think you are thinking about 2and2 who said they were "doing well"
too bad cause I said 'surviving' not 'thriving.' I think you are thinking about 2and2 who said they were "doing well"
ok, then "surviving" and "we've lost over half" isn't contradictory.
Since the 80s, it said. that was 30 years before Dodd Frank, but keep on keeping on. So yeah, surviving.
You really want to roll back regs on banks? Are you a banker? jesus dude
This is the biggest thing that sticks out to me. The Fiduciary Rule was going to be a win/win for everybody involved except for those trying to take money off of retirees and people who are uneducated, and now it won't be put into place in April.
The fact that they think it's "overly protective of people who don't need protecting" is comically out of touch.
Because of the consumer protections baked into DF to hopefully prevent another financial crisis by fault of reckless, deregulated banking.
If I own a restaurant and part of my overall expense is food safety, I am going to be less profitable than if I didn't have to worry about the consumer's safety. But should we be fighting to remove food safety regs?
This would be a great discussion if we had a President that was marginally competent and cared about anything other than getting his billionaire friends money (he admitted as much). As it is, anyone on the right thinking Trump is going to do anything to help middle class Americans has been taken by a hoax.
Conservatives would generally say yes.
A hoax they are more than willingness to believe.