WindyCityDeac
Well-known member
Its hilarious to watch people (who obviously never go to the politics board) try to have a rational conversation with RJ about whether or not he is right about something.
Kevin Swinton says hello
Its hilarious to watch people (who obviously never go to the politics board) try to have a rational conversation with RJ about whether or not he is right about something.
How does this sound, RJ? No trolling. Just a fair wager.You said, "The only reason they might approach 9-9 in they have the easiest schedule in the ACC and the ACC sucks."
Nowhere in that statement are you claiming they'll go 9-9, or even insinuating you think they will. Just saying if they do, it's because of an easy schedule. I took it to mean you see them going lower than that...
How about we call 9-9 a push. Better than 9-9 I win, worse you win, 9-9 nothing changes hands. Fair enough? What's our wager?
Hate to interrupt the RJ hate..... but
148: VT
150: BC
156: Wake
You said, "The only reason they might approach 9-9 in they have the easiest schedule in the ACC and the ACC sucks."
Nowhere in that statement are you claiming they'll go 9-9, or even insinuating you think they will. Just saying if they do, it's because of an easy schedule. I took it to mean you see them going lower than that...
How about we call 9-9 a push. Better than 9-9 I win, worse you win, 9-9 nothing changes hands. Fair enough? What's our wager?
How does this sound, RJ? No trolling. Just a fair wager.
Wow! We are out of the [Redacted] zone! Buzz is outdoing himself.
So how many wins are you saying they'll win? You're a moving target, buddy.Their schedule is so weak they could get 10 wins and still not be close to being a Top 60 team.
but does anybody really care whether we win 13 or 14 vs just 10 games?