BobStackFan4Life
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 31,661
- Reaction score
- 1,538
Nevermind, I see it begins with Odom's guys.
Hmm, I like the notion of 3 $5 players and fill in any 2 freebies, if that were an option. However that's not the rule, so I'll go with
Duncan 5
Paul 5
AFA 3
Dawson 1
Strickland 1
It pains me to leave off either of Rogers or Childress and I'm sure I'm biased by Duncan/Paul's more recent NBA success, but there it is.
Hmm, I like the notion of 3 $5 players and fill in any 2 freebies, if that were an option. However that's not the rule, so I'll go with
Duncan 5
Paul 5
AFA 3
Dawson 1
Strickland 1
It pains me to leave off either of Rogers or Childress and I'm sure I'm biased by Duncan/Paul's more recent NBA success, but there it is.
actually the choice is based on best season @ WF so CP3 is really the least desirable of the $5. Duncan is the obvious choice w/ a NPOY season but strong cases could be made for J-Ho, RR & Chill for the next spot. I went w/ J-Ho b/c he was the unanimous ACC POY and garnered some NPOY awards. Slightly better than RoRo's junior campaign imo.
Here's a pretty solid team w/ Rogers/Childress though
Rogers - 5
Childress - 5
Visser - 2
Rutland - 2
Levy - 1
I don't get why so many people think Strickland was any good. He only played over 18 mpg in one season. He only averaged of 7 ppg one season. He had freakish talent, but never realized it.
He's not close to being as good as Tucker, King, Jamaal or Craig. Heck, I'd probably take Derrick McQueen over Trent.
Well it said in the OP that you got each player for their best season. His senior year he was pretty good, 40 for 90 from 3 (44%), nice 3 and D piece. Basically all you want out of that spot is 3 and D anyways on a team with Paul and Duncan. Other players were better overall players for sure.
I don't get why so many people think Strickland was any good. He only played over 18 mpg in one season. He only averaged of 7 ppg one season. He had freakish talent, but never realized it.
He's not close to being as good as Tucker, King, Jamaal or Craig. Heck, I'd probably take Derrick McQueen over Trent.
King, Tucker and Levy all played SF. That's I had to play Strickland on my team. If he had Taron's or Jamaal's bball IQ or heart, he'd be in the NBA now.
Combo forwards vs. true wings, no?
Also my dude made it farther in pro ball than either of those guys.
And for as good as Levy was supposed to be, he never did much more than what he came in with...
Tucker played 66 games in the NBA. that's 66 more than Strickland ever will.
Chris King started 66 games in the NBA and played in a total of 103. Again more than Strickland ever will.
BTW, King averaged 15.2 for four years at Wake. He scored 1721 point, shot 51.9% from the field and averaged 6.1 RPG.
My bad he should be my other forward rather than Tucker.
Strickland can't sniff King's jock.