2&2 Slider To Leyritz
Well-known member
This. There has to be a breaking point in the undergraduate system at some point.
This. There has to be a breaking point in the undergraduate system at some point.
Honestly, agreed: if these are the reasons that you choose to go to college, state school is not a bad idea.
On the other hand, at Wake I had zero courses taught by a Teaching Assistant (though two labs). I had perhaps two classes with more than twenty students. Every course was taught by an instructor with their terminal degree. Every professor that I was interested in knowing knew my name. I took no more than two or three courses with multiple choice tests.
I'm not sure any public school in the country could boast more than a few of these.
Honestly, agreed: if these are the reasons that you choose to go to college, state school is not a bad idea.
On the other hand, at Wake I had zero courses taught by a Teaching Assistant (though two labs). I had perhaps two classes with more than twenty students. Every course was taught by an instructor with their terminal degree. Every professor that I was interested in knowing knew my name. I took no more than two or three courses with multiple choice tests.
I'm not sure any public school in the country could boast more than a few of these.
I'm not sure I buy the education bubble theory.
It would be nice to see some standard consumer protections given back to student loans (truth in lending, bankruptcy protection, refinancing, Fair Debt & Collection practices). You have to think that'd make lenders more cautious and you'd start to see tuition prices drop again.
There are many differences between higher education and the housing industry that help counter bubble theory.
No it is not.
You can live in a house, you can liquidate your house, you can short sell your shouse and you can discharge your housing debts in bankruptcy. Also, there isn't a shadow market of substitute housing goods at 1/4 of the costs.
But I don't think those differences help your argument.
Uh-huh. Perhaps the pool of people who can afford to pay full freight completely overlaps in every respect with people who did well on the SAT, and there would be no "business" reason to drop the SAT as an entrance requirement. I guess anything is possible.
What's Ph's argument?
That the education bubble is not as dangerous as the housing bubble. In one sense, he's right in that it is not as widespread but on the other hand it is more devastating to the impacted people. Crushing student loans are a financial death sentence under existing law.
Where did I post that?
There are many differences between higher education and the housing industry that help counter bubble theory.
Eh. At the current rate of increase, it will cost over $100K a year to send my soon to be 6 year old to Wake. Even if I don't have to pay sticker, it will be a lot of money that could be more efficiently spent elsewhere or at least applying to multiple private schools to get the best deal.
That could be debated, but I don't think it's the central argument. The question is if the education at Wake is 3-5 times better than at a public school.