• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

why hillary lost: the great american lie

RChildress107 said:
The real question is when will Republicans take responsibility for putting Trump in the White House and stop blaming Hillary for the shitshow we have now.

If you are comfortable with the guy you helped elect as president why give a shit about who the losers blame for their loss.
Click to expand...

The real question is when will Dems take responsibility for putting Trump in the White House by running Clinton.

The first female candidate nominated by a major party with 50% more $$$ to spend and she can't beat George Trump. It's all on Hillary Clinton.
 
silk said:
The real question is when will Dems take responsibility for putting Trump in the White House by running Clinton.

The first female candidate nominated by a major party with 50% more $$$ to spend and she can't beat George Trump. It's all on Hillary Clinton.
Click to expand...


Clinton, 48.2%, 65,446,892

Trump, 46.3%, 62,805,284
 
silk said:
The real question is when will Dems take responsibility for putting Trump in the White House by running Clinton.

The first female candidate nominated by a major party with 50% more $$$ to spend and she can't beat George Trump. It's all on Hillary Clinton.
Click to expand...

No, no it's the FBI (some irony here), Russia, the EC, Women haters, racists, rubes, Comey, and Fake News fault!!!! Certainly under no circumstances will Hilldawg take personal responsibility for it (more irony here)
 
trump won because Christina from Flip or Flop cheated on that goofy husband of hers. #shame
 
What is really sad is how many people point fingers at secondary items without looking at the primary reason:

- FBI investigation - as if they somehow made the decision to establish a private email server
- Clinton Foundation - as if it is the media's fault she and her husband are corrupt
- Hackers - as if Podesta didn't write all those emails showing how the DNC was in the sack for her all along

Everyone is shooting the messengers.

She was a flawed candidate. Deeply flawed. You lose to Donald Trump, regardless of all the secondary stuff, you are a really lousy candidate.
 
Yeah anyone that tries to defend Hillary as some great candidate is full of it. However the election was a rejection of a lot of things including a lot of conservative foundations as well. Both parties got taken to the woodshed by a deeply flawed and shitty candidate in Trump.
 
DeacMan said:
What is really sad is how many people point fingers at secondary items without looking at the primary reason:

- FBI investigation - as if they somehow made the decision to establish a private email server
- Clinton Foundation - as if it is the media's fault she and her husband are corrupt
- Hackers - as if Podesta didn't write all those emails showing how the DNC was in the sack for her all along

Everyone is shooting the messengers.

She was a flawed candidate. Deeply flawed. You lose to Donald Trump, regardless of all the secondary stuff, you are a really lousy candidate.
Click to expand...

There's no question that she was a terribly flawed candidate who ran a terrible campaign again. She played prevent defense rather than offense.

However, Comey's unprecedented and partisan action ten days before the election had an impact. Comedy refused to put out the data about Russian hack over thirty days before the election saying it would be unfair and could impact the election. But with ten days to go he held a national press conference to say something might have happened when he ZERO evidence of what he discussed. No prosecutor or PD would have done that unless they were trying impact the election.

It's indisputable that a foreign power hacked and impacted the election. It is also a fact that Putin has changed emails in the past when he did this in other countries. It's amazing that DeacMan and others de facto support the commission of these illegal acts by blaming the victims.
 
RJKarl said:
There's no question that she was a terribly flawed candidate who ran a terrible campaign again. She played prevent defense rather than offense.

However, Comey's unprecedented and partisan action ten days before the election had an impact. Comedy refused to put out the data about Russian hack over thirty days before the election saying it would be unfair and could impact the election. But with ten days to go he held a national press conference to say something might have happened when he ZERO evidence of what he discussed. No prosecutor or PD would have done that unless they were trying impact the election.

It's indisputable that a foreign power hacked and impacted the election. It is also a fact that Putin has changed emails in the past when he did this in other countries. It's amazing that DeacMan and others de facto support the commission of these illegal acts by blaming the victims.
Click to expand...

Wrong.

It is not "undisputed" that a foreign power hacked or impacted the election.

There has also never at any time been an email that wikileaks has released that had been altered from what the original author sent.
 
WFcatamount22 said:
giphy.gif
Click to expand...

FIFY
 
WFcatamount22 said:
To bad that is not how we keep score homie. It is like someone in a match play, complaining they shot a lower score. Whine more about it though I am sure it will help
Click to expand...

Must you guys think anything written about this election is whining? My comment was not whining. Silk says "he first female candidate nominated by a major party with 50% more $$$ to spend and she can't beat George Trump. It's all on Hillary Clinton." I post the popular election results to basically say it's hard to blame someone who had more votes. It's pretty simple if you had bothered to think.
 
Skydog Deac said:
Must you guys think anything written about this election is whining? My comment was not whining. Silk says "he first female candidate nominated by a major party with 50% more $$$ to spend and she can't beat George Trump. It's all on Hillary Clinton." I post the popular election results to basically say it's hard to blame someone who had more votes. It's pretty simple if you had bothered to think.
Click to expand...

Some people like a more flavorful complex whine, the whine that comes from the PH/Townie region of the boards. While others, like you, go with a simpler more palatable whine. These originate from the RJ regions of the boards.
 
My bad, it is indisputable by everyone with a brain and every US intelligence agency. They all know Putin created and directed the hacks. ZERO Republicans who have seen the data have disputed it. Even McConnell and Ryan have called Russia out. You are on island of wackos.

READING IS FUNDAMENTAL...well it is to most, but rarely matters to you. Here's what I said, "It is also a fact that Putin has changed emails in the past when he did this in other countries."

Where did I say Wilileaks changed anything? They would have no idea or access to anything other than what Putin spoon-fed them. They have zero idea whether his people changed things.
 
WFcatamount22 said:
Some people like a more flavorful complex whine, the whine that comes from the PH/Townie region of the boards. While others, like you, go with a simpler more palatable whine. These originate from the RJ regions of the boards.
Click to expand...

None of those whines will age well.
 
WFcatamount22 said:
Some people like a more flavorful complex whine, the whine that comes from the PH/Townie region of the boards. While others, like you, go with a simpler more palatable whine. These originate from the RJ regions of the boards.
Click to expand...

The region of facts is totally foreign to you.
 
Catamount doesn't care if Putin influenced the election. It obviously went his way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top