CDeacMan
Ishmael Smith
So my wife and I are moving to DC next month and we were there a couple weeks ago apartment hunting. We had the help of a broker who usually handles people looking to buy, but she was a bit of a family friend so she was helping us out. Anyway, we were talking about the different neighborhoods in the city and how obviously some of them are much nicer than other areas, while some are "coming up" and others are somewhat deteriorating. She told an anecdote about one young family she dealt with that specifically wanted to buy in an area that wasn't great currently, because they wanted to essentially be "pioneers" in making the area better in hopes that a few years from now it would be a more attractive place to live (and obviously it was cheaper at the time so that's certainly a factor in the buying decision).
But it just lead to a discussion with my wife later about whether we would ever do something similar and forgo the more established areas of whatever city we eventually decide to live in and try to be a part of "building up" an area that isn't yet.
Any opinions or thoughts on this?
But it just lead to a discussion with my wife later about whether we would ever do something similar and forgo the more established areas of whatever city we eventually decide to live in and try to be a part of "building up" an area that isn't yet.
Any opinions or thoughts on this?