I'm not pushing Amaker, but just providing facts.
Seton Hall 68-55(overall) 32-36 (conf)
Michigan 108-84 43-53
Harvard 139-70 67-31
315-209 (career)
Great numbers, no. But he still had winning records at each stop. The question with Amaker clearly is was his performance at Seton Hall and Michigan indicative of what would happen if he gets a shot at another major, or does Harvard represent what he has learned over the years and we should discount his first trip around the majors.
Seton Hall 68-55(overall) 32-36 (conf)
Michigan 108-84 43-53
Harvard 139-70 67-31
315-209 (career)
Great numbers, no. But he still had winning records at each stop. The question with Amaker clearly is was his performance at Seton Hall and Michigan indicative of what would happen if he gets a shot at another major, or does Harvard represent what he has learned over the years and we should discount his first trip around the majors.