- Joined
- Mar 25, 2011
- Messages
- 23,398
- Reaction score
- 6,565
Think he yacked yesterday.. Not sure about today.
And you're right about Spieth.. No one amazing skill but a lot of really really good ones.
He's a savant around the greens.
Think he yacked yesterday.. Not sure about today.
And you're right about Spieth.. No one amazing skill but a lot of really really good ones.
He's a savant around the greens.
Funny, for a guy who "struggled" during the mid-summer months from the US Open on, Spieth still had an adjusted scoring avg of 69.75 going into the PGA. I know cuz I keep a spreadsheet for gambling purposes!
Spieth was only hitting around 64% of GIR, but his scrambling remained pretty steady throughout around 63-65%, which ranked 5th on tour at the time.
The media needs to stop making him seem like milquetoast Tom Kite. His scrambling is already in another category.
Just looked up Spieth's 2014 stat rankings. He drives it 289.7, which is average, and hits 58.8% of his fairways, which is a little below average. He hits 62.5% GIR, a bit below average, averages 1.717 putts, which is really good, and his save average is 56.7% which is above average. Good numbers but only putting average would be considered great. But dude is the package, and the maturity for his age is off the charts.
By comparison, Rory has unreal driving distance, combined driving, GIR and putting numbers (putting is even below Spieth's) but a low save % under 50%.
Kite always struck me as a bit of a prick. One of my least favorite US golfers of the 80s-90s.
Kite always struck me as a bit of a prick. One of my least favorite US golfers of the 80s-90s.
I always liked Floyd. When he was hot and in contention in big tournaments, his eyes would double in size. The man could really roll it when he was on a roll. I liked Lanny too, mostly because of Wake. He's blunt and occasionally abrasive, but that didn't bother me, and he, like Raymond, was a tough as nails competitor. Don't consider either of them as pricks. But when I think back to the golfing pricks of the 80s-90s, I think of Kite and most of the Euros from that era (like Faldo, Monty, Seve, Olazabal...).
Ya, I think Raymond gets a bad rap since he was so intense a competitor. In the extended conversations and other features he's done on the GC, he struck me as a pretty affable and genuine guy. Probably just too blunt or honest for some people's taste. Wasn't Lanny that way too, not afraid to tell you what he thought?
I can't help it though, I love Monty on the tee vee during majors, he cracks me up. He can be very self-deprecating and charming, while Faldo doesn't come across quite as well.
But the fact that those Euros you cited, and Raymond and Lanny and the quiet fury of Larry Nelson weren't renown at the time for what nice guys they were helped make them successful champions where as some of today's talented players perhaps are a bit too nice (Kuchar, Rickie, Adam, Stricker) to win the big one or multiple big ones. Will be interesting to see if Adam can win multiple majors; feel like he has the potential equal Els' and Lanny's 4.
I digress.
Add Scott Hoch to the list of pricks.
Add Scott Hoch to the list of pricks.
Difference in a ballsy, intense competitor and an all out prick.