dalbertthekid
Well-known member
FWIW, the players like the move.
Battle and Childress working with guards. Buzz and LaRue working with bigs.
Battle and Childress working with guards. Buzz and LaRue working with bigs.
Just be glad he's around so that when they improve, you'll have someone to give credit to other than Bz.
FWIW, the players like the move.
Battle and Childress working with guards. Buzz and LaRue working with bigs.
FIFY.They don't count as standards if they aren't mine.
Trying to support our team without losing all sanity. Hopefully the team will get back to the top without selling our soul. I would be completed embarrassed as a Wake alum and fan if we went to the Final 4 and then ended up vacating the wins or on probation. The statistics definitely justify the position of the BzOut crowd. In defense of [Redacted], he was forced to keep almost all of the assistant coaches from the previous regime (I'm sure they are all great people). How often does that happen?
I care. I think it's ludicrous for anyone to be fired for performance reasons when the guy responsible for it all is not held to any standards whatsoever.
I care. I think it's ludicrous for anyone to be fired for performance reasons when the guy responsible for it all is not held to any standards whatsoever.
As we know, any wholesale culture transplant requires the bizarre step of retaining 80% of the prior staff, amirite?
The problem with this entire debacle is that none of the stated reasons for the change match any action taken in the course and scope. I supported DinoOut, but will never, ever understand BuzzIn. Nothing personal, but the guy was a non-fit ab initio. Never made sense, and yet somehow makes less sense with each passing day.
To the Youth-as-an-excuse crowd, the youngest MajCon team in the tournament almost won it last night. The youngest DID win it last year. Wake isn't suffering from a youth problem.
I care also. I like Walt, like his family, and think he's been great for the University and community. But putting the emotional aspects aside, I could use some education. What is the typical progression into an assistant coaching position in the ACC? I realize there will be variances, but comparing their respective experience levels it's hard to understand why Childress would replace Corbean when he has no coaching experience at all. Both played in college. Childress then played professionally, was an assistant to AD for 1 year and a director of player development for 1 year. Meanwhile Cobean was an assistant at 3 different schools, a head coach, and then DOBO here for 4 years prior to becoming an assistant. Are these backgrounds equivalent?
Bz is being held to Wellman's standards and Wellman is being held to the BOT/big donor standards...with some slack for previous achievment apparently. Who is not being held to a set of standards? They might not be your standards, but they are being held to standards of some sort.
What did Corbean do, exactly, for our team? Was he a good recruiter? Good defensive coach? Good with the guards? Bigs?
I feel like we talk about how crucial Jeff Battle is all the time, but I have zero clue what the strengths/weaknesses of our other coaches are.
As a fan it seems pretty difficult to measure or judge the performance of assistant coaches. Frankly, it should be up to the head coach to handle that. But how does a head coach judge the coaching ability of someone who has never coached?