dot com
Well-known member
Haha suck it Enfield. You coulda had all this! Go home and console yourself with your supermodel wife.
I know they have beaten anyone good yet but Wake wins tomorrow and I might start thinking an NIT appearance is possible. Maybe.
I know they have beaten anyone good yet but Wake wins tomorrow and I might start thinking an NIT appearance is possible. Maybe.
Of course, our OOC means well have to achieve that much more to even be considered.
Came back to make one observation...in one post (and one post only):
I see many similiarities between this team and Carl Tacy's 4th team (1975-76). He also began with three down years after he inherited a program that was completely awful after Charlie Davis left in 1971. That 4th team began the season 10-0....but it had not yet learned how to win the close games when the competetion got a lot tougher in January. I believe there are stages in the rebuilding process. 1) You have to get some players. 2) You have to lose some tough games in the conference before you learn how to win those close games in the end. 3) Finally, you reach the point where you not only know how, but expect to win those close games in the end. (The 1976-77 team reached that final stage.) In most cases, this doesn't happen all at once. After starting 10-0 in that 1975-76 season, we lost 6 of our first 7 conference games (including OT loses against Carolina & Duke) before regrouping to win 6 of the last 10 to finish the season 17-10.
The next year that wonderful group of players (including Skip Brown, Jerry Schellenberg, Rod Griffin, Frank Johnson, Leroy McDonald & Larry Harrison) made it all the way to the Elite Eight....and within 20 minutes of the Final Four before losing to the eventual NCAA Champion, Marquette. (I was in Oklahoma City to see it.)
I'm not suggesting that this team is going to equal what the 1976-77 team did....but I do see many similiarities. And I am confident of one thing: This team has the potential to be a very good team. It has depth, talented...if young, in most cases...players at all five spots, a lot of heart, unselfishness, and is already doing a lot of things (defense, ball/player movement, etc) very, very well. And there is simply no way that coaching could not have been a part of this improvement. It is a shame that we have so many people who are so invested in failure that they refuse to see...or at least refuse to admit that they see...what is happening here with this team.
Like with that 4th Tacy team, I will not be surprised to see some bumps in the road in January as this team moves thru "Stage 2" of this process....but something good is definitely happening here and this team has the potential to develop into something special. It has already become a very entertaining team that is enjoyable to watch.
Now, I've said my piece. Those of you who are so inclined can get back to your depressing, never-ending negativity.....but this team deserves your support. (And don't tell me you support the team but not the coaches. You cannot support a team when you are openly hoping that it loses, just to feed your hatred for the coach.) I realize that this doesn't apply to all the people on this board....but it applies to a hell of a lot of them.
I think that's what a lot of us are afraid of. If buzz's ceiling is Tacy we should go ahead and pull the plug now.
Yes that OOC will be torn apart should we be in the conversation late.
Of course, our OOC means well have to achieve that much more to even be considered.
I think that's what a lot of us are afraid of. If buzz's ceiling is Tacy, he should never have been hired.
I think that's what a lot of us are afraid of. If buzz's ceiling is Tacy we should go ahead and pull the plug now.