Strickland33
Well-known member
My favorite part of this is how PhDeac keeps saying Dan's comments were "unsolicited" when:
1) He repeatedly rephrases Dan's comments to fit his own arguments
2) Openly criticizes his articles and competency in a public forum where I'd guess 50% of his readership frequents.
3) Both PM's quoted are direct responses to things Ph said about Dan.
4) It's likely impossible to find a thread that mentions Dan Collins that does not have a critical response from Ph
5) With 35,000 posts you're easily one of the most outspoken fans on the internet for all things Wake Forest Sports
But a PM politely telling you he feels you're repeatedly misrepresenting his point is "unsolicted." Riiiiiiiiight.
And if you're wondering how people know you take it personally, see point #4 and your repeated personal comments about Dan. I mean, did you not just post if you were Dan Collins you'd ask for $25 and chicken on the jaybone betting thread?
Hey - feuding with a beat writer about not being critical enough about an Athletic Department is all well and good - it's pretty funny most of the time actually. But the superiority act just ruins it. You have to realize how transparent it is.
Dan, is that you?