he'a a parody
So I've gone through 4 pages hoping to become better enlightened on the issue and still haven't identified (1) what the problem is, and (2) what the President's proposal would fix.
Right now i get 15 mb/s for 29.99. What will net neutrality change?
It seems like a decent concept: essentially to prevent monopolies but what is the actual results of this push by Obama other than more govt oversight (not saying that in a bad way - sometimes more oversight is good. This may be one of those cases).
Right now i get 15 mb/s for 29.99. What will net neutrality change?
It seems like a decent concept: essentially to prevent monopolies but what is the actual results of this push by Obama other than more govt oversight (not saying that in a bad way - sometimes more oversight is good. This may be one of those cases).
Right now i get 15 mb/s for 29.99. What will net neutrality change?
It seems like a decent concept: essentially to prevent monopolies but what is the actual results of this push by Obama other than more govt oversight (not saying that in a bad way - sometimes more oversight is good. This may be one of those cases).
Net neutrality won't change your line speeds. Not having net neutrality will lead to ISP charging providers for speed.
Your 15 Mbps won't matter if Netflix/ESPN/whatever is limited to 1 Mbps because they're not paying.
Also, larger content providers will be able to pay the charge, limiting the entry of smaller competitors.
Rest assured, he WILL be taking your guns with this initiative.
I realize it's just a rhetorical maneuver but in what way is net neutrality remotely similar to Obamacare?
I realize it's just a rhetorical maneuver but in what way is net neutrality remotely similar to Obamacare?
Government intervention in a previously private enterprise?
Government intervention in a previously private enterprise?
or exactly when healthcare was last a "private enterprise". Hint: a long, long time before Obamacare.
Anyway, its a stupid comment by Cruz. There is a much larger issue here, which is that the FCC and its enabling legislation was created long before the internet was a twinkle in Al Gore's eye. The agency and the legislation are poorly suited to dealing with the modern internet reality in 2014. In most countries with a functioning government, the legislature would realize this and come up with some kind of modernized regulatory structure to deal with it, since the internet is a hugely important component of a modern economy. Instead, because our legislature is completely nonfunctional, the executive branch is forced to try and find a way to shoehorn the internet into 50-year old laws governing utilities. The result will be years-long high stakes litigation. Completely asinine and an indictment of our entire system.