Deacon923
Scooter Banks
Let me spell it out for you, since you apparently are incapable of understanding basic logic. Your argument against the Bergdahl trade is that it "potentially puts American lives at risk". I spelled out for you why that is an incredibly weak argument. There may be other arguments against the Bergdahl trade, but "putting American lives at risk" is not even in the same room as a reasonable argument.
Your laughable counter to this was to try to downplay police malfeasance and racism because it doesn't kill as many people as car accidents. That is true. It's also stupid, because literally nobody in the world is against police malfeasance and racism because it "puts American lives at risk". I'm not even sure your attempt at debate rises to the level of a strawman, because it's just idiotic. People are concerned about police malfeasance and racism because, among other reasons, we want to live in a free and democratic country where all citizens get due process of law and have their constitutional rights protected. In other words, because there are bigger things at stake than how many American lives are "at risk."
Get a clue.
Your laughable counter to this was to try to downplay police malfeasance and racism because it doesn't kill as many people as car accidents. That is true. It's also stupid, because literally nobody in the world is against police malfeasance and racism because it "puts American lives at risk". I'm not even sure your attempt at debate rises to the level of a strawman, because it's just idiotic. People are concerned about police malfeasance and racism because, among other reasons, we want to live in a free and democratic country where all citizens get due process of law and have their constitutional rights protected. In other words, because there are bigger things at stake than how many American lives are "at risk."
Get a clue.