guitardeac
Well-known member
Interesting list. Just putting it out there. Will comment later when I have time.
http://www.billboard.com/charts/greatest-billboard-200-albums
http://www.billboard.com/charts/greatest-billboard-200-albums
oof. didn't get past the top 10.
Those rankings arent opinion based
sort of are...as in the opinion of DJs/radio congomerates and people listening/buying the records
With regard to music charts: those actions aren't a measure of opinion, but a measure of performance.
sure...but it's a performance of sales, which I think is arguably a metric of opinion
oof. didn't get past the top 10.
How it works:
These all-time rankings are based on actual performance on the weekly Billboard Hot 100 (from its launch on Aug. 4, 1958 through Oct. 10, 2015) and Billboard 200 (from Aug. 17, 1963 — when we combined our two leading pop album album charts for stereo and mono releases into one all-encompassing weekly chart — through Oct. 10, 2015). Titles are ranked based on an inverse point system, with weeks at No. 1 earning the greatest value and weeks at lower rungs earning the least. Due to changes in chart methodology over the years, eras are weighted differently to account for chart turnover rates over various periods. Artists are ranked based on the combined point totals, as outlined above, of all their Hot 100 or Billboard 200 chart entries.
Yeah It still doesnt work. Thriller was #1 for 37 weeks, Adele only 24. Thriller had 4 #1 singles, Adele had none.
Then that must mean that the Adele album stayed ranked higher for longer after it dropped from #1. I don't think singles plays into it at all, right?