wake20
Well-known member
Shaka Smart is a legit candidate. Fuck this. K, Roy, Smart, and fucking Bzz. Awesome. Someone kill me.
So why are we afraid of a guy who has finished 5th and 4th in the CAA in his 2 years. Seems to be a great tourney coach (won the CBI last year), but it will be interesting to see if he can actually...you know...coach. Running up and down the sidelines is great, but he'll need a top notch staff.
Bilas tweeted that they've hit 12+ threes in 3 of their 5 tournament games. They hadn't done that all year. Sometimes a team just plays out of their skin.
So why are we afraid of a guy who has finished 5th and 4th in the CAA in his 2 years. Seems to be a great tourney coach (won the CBI last year), but it will be interesting to see if he can actually...you know...coach. Running up and down the sidelines is great, but he'll need a top notch staff.
Bilas tweeted that they've hit 12+ threes in 3 of their 5 tournament games. They hadn't done that all year. Sometimes a team just plays out of their skin.
There is nothing I can see that would prevent Shaka from being successful, assuming he is given resources and time. He would definitely have the resources at NCSU. Presumably, he would be given the time (at least 4 or 5 years). Now, whether he will win national championships or get to the final four or displace UNC or Duke - very questionable. But, he will have State competitive and a consistent tournament team, both quickly and regularly. To me, that is "successful" at NCSU (or Wake, for that matter).
I am starting to think the same thing, especially since he's using Anthony Grant's players. I don't think he's a horrible coach, but I'm not yet convinced he's John Wooden reincarnated yet either - he may just have lightning in a bottle right now. Regardless, good for him if he capitalizes on it.
If nothing else, hopefully he'll be able to buy some better dress shirts that actually fit him once he gets PAID.
Why? I just don't see anything from him that differentiates him from Stan Heath.
Literally just made this post on the State board comparing Marshall to Smart, I'll just paste it here.
This. It's interesting that the guy in the Final Four, who got an at-large bid, has more coaching concerns than the guy with zero NCAA tournaments in 4 years. The only 4 years he's spent in a conference that isn't complete trash.
VCU had a stretch where they lost 4 out of 5, beating Wichita State in that stretch, and has been fantastic the rest of the season. This whole thing of making it look like he sucked during the season is very overblown. They were looking great before that stretch, and their recovery since that stretch is hugely impressive.
Not saying Shaka is destined to be great. I think the jury is still out. But isn't the object of college basketball to get your team to the tourney and have them playing their best ball once they get there?
If you don't like Shaka, you're clearly a racist.