That's from May.
Ahh, I didn't look at the date on the article...Nate Silver retweeted it last week and Micah Cohen, 538's politics editor/host of the 538 politics podcast tweeted it recently too.
That's from May.
They were probably making the point that his base shrunk to his current approval so don't expect it to go down any further.
538 says Trump's base is shrinking:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/donald-trumps-base-is-shrinking/amp/
Yeah. I see. Seems like a weird thing to tweet after polls showed Trump's approval didn't go down after what pundits on both sides think was his worst week.
You'll have to pardon me if I don't pay much attention to what Nate Silver thinks about Donald Trump's chances on anything.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/127791494211/nate-silver-gives-trump-2-chance-of-getting
Nate Silver Gives Trump 2% Chance of Getting Nominated
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/five...llary-clinton-wins-election/story?id=40213871
This morning on ABC's “Good Morning America,” FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver predicted that Hillary Clinton will win the presidential election against Donald Trump.
Clinton has a 79 percent chance of winning, compared with Trump's 20 percent, according to FiveThirtyEight’s forecast.
TITCR.
Dems still don't get it. The reason Trump won was a repudiation of the self-aggrandizing political correctness that has overtaken their party. Their response? MOAR of it.
They are surprised that Trump's numbers don't suffer. The only reason they ever rose in the first place was the voter's fatigue with their tone-deaf pandering and divisiveness (which they are now doubling down on).
I don't think they are ever going to understand why what happened, happened. They are totally tone deaf in their youthful arrogance. I'm beginning to think that this must be one of the unfortunate by-products of a quarter-million dollar liberal arts degree.
TITCR.
Dems still don't get it. The reason Trump won was a repudiation of the self-aggrandizing political correctness that has overtaken their party. Their response? MOAR of it.
They are surprised that Trump's numbers don't suffer. The only reason they ever rose in the first place was the voter's fatigue with their tone-deaf pandering and divisiveness (which they are now doubling down on).
If they really wanted to beat Trump, they'd pipe down and let him govern. If they're correct that he's an unqualified fraud, he'll fail and have no one to deflect it to. But they won't do that. They can't turn off their default setting.
If they're correct that he's an unqualified fraud, he'll fail and have no one to deflect it to. But they won't do that.
It is not the correct response. The response displays absolutely zero understanding of how probabilistic predictive statements work.
It is not the correct response. The response displays absolutely zero understanding of how probabilistic predictive statements work.
TITCR.
Dems still don't get it. The reason Trump won was a repudiation of the self-aggrandizing political correctness that has overtaken their party. Their response? MOAR of it.
They are surprised that Trump's numbers don't suffer. The only reason they ever rose in the first place was the voter's fatigue with their tone-deaf pandering and divisiveness (which they are now doubling down on).
If they really wanted to beat Trump, they'd pipe down and let him govern. If they're correct that he's an unqualified fraud, he'll fail and have no one to deflect it to. But they won't do that. They can't turn off their default setting.