mafia absolutely won in spite of me. I said as much after the game. The idea that I like people following me around in this game though is wildly wildly off base. People can do whatever they want. Everything I did that game was to try to keep heat away from Juice (and the 2 people I civ leaned early - redwing and sd3).
I identify win conditions as mafia early. Toog was not a win condition. I was not a win condition. Ensuring people who seemed like civs made it to the end was a win condition. Since people give credit to my civ leans as I posted before I saw your post, I thought by civ leaning the 3 would buy them time. I didn’t actually want Toog to die the round he did but I thought it had the derivative benefit of giving me credence as a civ which has nothing to do whatsoever with me trying to stay alive and everything to do with providing cover for the 3 mafia players who were actually playing well.
You may disagree but you don’t know me very well. It had absolutely nothing to do with ego and everything to do with strategy. Whether I was effective with it is a different question.
E.g I seem civ, 3 mafia I civ lean I can probably protect, including Thanos who was trying to compile the stones. Anyway - enough about that, but I thought it was worth clarifying. I do, by the way, genuinely try to be helpful and explain things to the greatest extent I’m able. But my style in the middle of a round is reading specific posts and deriving leans. I don’t generally then follow up with a paragraph about why Gouda is a civ until it’s relevant or if that person is getting heat.
But as an example: Gouda, a) makes declarative statement about mako p1 that he doesn’t likely make about mako if mako is civ or his teammate, b) his follow up on p2 is genuine even if it’s jokey, c) he wouldn’t post that at me if he was mafia and I am civ (which I am) on p.3, d) his dialogues with Romanov, and then e) saying he didn’t remember why he voted for Ph.
^^^ all of that is civ coming from Gouda. Again, some is specific to a player, some is generic.
For Da, who I used to have a hard time reading when I was playing, I like post 391 because I agree with it and (what I assume Da’s sentiment is there), I also like post 454. I thought his tone with his other posts was fine except one which I don’t recall without looking back through.
Earnestness is a civ trait. Trying to figure things out is a civ trait. You know what you’re doing as mafia. Trick as a civ is figuring out who is actually trying to figure shit out versus who is pretending to figure shit out. It’s why fake claims out more mafia teammates than anything because mafia knows their teammate is lying and are usually shit about pretending to deduce the veracity of a claim.