• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

GATOR BOWL VS TEXAS A&M, psyche RUTGERS

Wake should get one more possession. Perry might get his record if he breaks a short get-the-first-down pass for more yards.
 
IAppreciateIt said:
he may or may not have tried to not hit him (hard to give smenda the benefit of the doubt, but not relevant either way) but he did hit him. miles fox didn’t mean to face mask the rutgers QB in the first half but he did and the penalty was called.

i’m probably in the rare minority of folks who like the targeting rule because i think it’s necessary for football to be viable in the future and keeping players from getting hit in the head (regardless of intent) is a big part of it. defensive players will adjust just like they have to all other rule changes.
Click to expand...

Credit for doubling down on the bad take. He DID adjust as much as humanly possible by jumping over him. And, the "hit" doesn't even meet the definition of targeting because the contact wasn't forcible.

I don't have a problem with targeting rules in general but they must be reasonable and take into account the realities of a fast, physical game.
 
scooter84 said:
Credit for doubling down on the bad take. He DID adjust as much as humanly possible by jumping over him. And, the "hit" doesn't even meet the definition of targeting because the contact wasn't forcible.

I don't have a problem with targeting rules in general but they must be reasonable and take into account the realities of a fast, physical game.
Click to expand...

Say it again- JUST TRUCK THE QB. SAME DIFFERENCE.

Wake has been burned both ways by this crap rule.
 
Could be the worst bowl game ever. Rutgers is terrible. It has to be time to get rid of the bowl games. The stands are empty at all these games. Gambling is the only thing keeping the tv contracts going. Go to a 16 team tourney and get rid of all this nonsense.
 
scooter84 said:
Credit for doubling down on the bad take. He DID adjust as much as humanly possible by jumping over him. And, the "hit" doesn't even meet the definition of targeting because the contact wasn't forcible.

I don't have a problem with targeting rules in general but they must be reasonable and take into account the realities of a fast, physical game.
Click to expand...

Well said.
 
ralphkitleyrules said:
Could be the worst bowl game ever. Rutgers is terrible. It has to be time to get rid of the bowl games. The stands are empty at all these games. Gambling is the only thing keeping the tv contracts going. Go to a 16 team tourney and get rid of all this nonsense.
Click to expand...

The tv ratings usually end up being decent though, because people are sitting around and have an appetite for football.
 
ralphkitleyrules said:
Could be the worst bowl game ever. Rutgers is terrible. It has to be time to get rid of the bowl games. The stands are empty at all these games. Gambling is the only thing keeping the tv contracts going. Go to a 16 team tourney and get rid of all this nonsense.
Click to expand...

Ridiculous. We got weeks of additional practice, the team got a well deserved trip, and we get to send our seniors out with a win. And we had an 11 win season.
 
ralphkitleyrules said:
Could be the worst bowl game ever. Rutgers is terrible. It has to be time to get rid of the bowl games. The stands are empty at all these games. Gambling is the only thing keeping the tv contracts going. Go to a 16 team tourney and get rid of all this nonsense.
Click to expand...

I mean you know we weren’t supposed to be playing Rutgers, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top