• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

2021 Republican Coup (Practice Run)

WakeForestRanger said:
If not, it’s still important to get as much into the record as possible for a future Edward Gibbon.
Click to expand...

Oh, I agree - I want it all on the record for posterity. I just don't think it'll make a damn bit of difference in the short-term.
 
FBI seized John Eastman's phone a day or two ago. Did it as he was leaving a restaurant.
 
This is good stuff, I don't know if its worth all the secrecy good, but it does a good job of showing how un-hinged Trump was that day and how he didn't care about potential violence.
 
Yes, but unfortunately, it's what we already know about Trump even if we didn't know the specific facts and events. All of this is baked into people's politics. Republicans know Trump is crazy and promoted a violent coup but they still support him.

It's definitely a waste of time to discuss public events like cabinet resignations due to Jan 6. It comes off like Cheney trying to whitewash her party.
 
add something else to the list of behaviors the former president and my 2 1/2 year old have in common: flinging their plate at the wall.
 
wakelaw13 said:
Oh shit. Cheney is calling out witness tampering by Trump and associates.
Click to expand...

Will any of it matter? There's probably a Federalist blog post explaining why that's not witness tampering.
 
PhDeac said:
Will any of it matter? There's probably a Federalist blog post explaining why that's not witness tampering.
Click to expand...

We haven't seen enough evidence to determine whether it's actually criminal tampering. It is significant as further evidence of their crimes - innocent people don't need to encourage witnesses to "do the right thing."

I'll go on the record now. There will be high level criminal charges issued against Trump, Meadows, and others related to the attempted coup and Jan 6 itself.
 
PhDeac said:
Will any of it matter? There's probably a Federalist blog post explaining why that's not witness tampering.
Click to expand...

well I don't think "witness tampering" is stated directly in the Constitution, therefore it's not an issue
 
wakelaw13 said:
We haven't seen enough evidence to determine whether it's actually criminal tampering. It is significant as further evidence of their crimes - innocent people don't need to encourage witnesses to "do the right thing."

I'll go on the record now. There will be high level criminal charges issued against Trump, Meadows, and others related to the attempted coup and Jan 6 itself.
Click to expand...

I hope you're right, but I doubt it. And even if there are, they'll get away with it.
 
I agree totally with wakelaw13. The only person in this thing who tried to get Trump to do the right thing was the White House Counsel.
 
wakelaw13 said:
We haven't seen enough evidence to determine whether it's actually criminal tampering. It is significant as further evidence of their crimes - innocent people don't need to encourage witnesses to "do the right thing."

I'll go on the record now. There will be high level criminal charges issued against Trump, Meadows, and others related to the attempted coup and Jan 6 itself.
Click to expand...


There f’ing should be.
 
Trump refutes Hutchinson testimony. "She is bad news."

 
 
man all these folks saying she's not a credible witness would be well-served then to come in and set the record straight
 
BarcaDeac said:
man all these folks saying she's not a credible witness would be well-served then to come in and set the record straight
Click to expand...

And they will set the record straight on Fox News.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top