wakephan09
fuck duke
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 29,287
- Reaction score
- 3,506
Impossible to say, but Griffis came in and had a handful of turnovers himself.Would not have won but not a disaster as it was.
Impossible to say, but Griffis came in and had a handful of turnovers himself.Would not have won but not a disaster as it was.
My honest opinion: because our coaching, scheme, and development is still ahead of our talent and 3/4 of the way through the season, after surviving some close games, we've been banged up and opposing coaches have enough tape to come up with a gamelan to beat us.
I'm no football genius so I could certainly be wrong. But I don't think it has to be a total collapse for my hypothesis to make sense.That suggest a total team collapse. This wasn’t that.
Really?That suggest a total team collapse. This wasn’t that.
So our third qtr collapse happens in college?? How bout finding equivalents Has to be very very rare.Today was embarrassing. But it also happens in college football
OK St got blanked 48-0 by KSt today. They were ranked 1 ahead of us
Next few games will be more telling to me than today. Is this the same run out of gas in November team that seems to always exist under Clawson? Or is this a team that no showed today and run the table rest of the way?
So you think we would have won if we pulled Hartman after the first two turnovers?
Louisville clearly had a gameplan and executed it perfectly. And we could not stop it.
Maybe it's on Clawson for not figuring out it. Or maybe this just wasn't our day.
Correct.That gameplan could have just resulted in incompletions and sacks not pick sixes and fumbles. The pick sixes and fumbles are on Hartman.
Louisville won their last two games by pressuring the QB and causing turnovers. The plan was not unique to the WF game. WF coaches can also watch tape and see how opponents win games.I'm no football genius so I could certainly be wrong. But I don't think it has to be a total collapse for my hypothesis to make sense.
Clemson figured out the way to beat the RPO was to set up to make us run it every time and then overpower us at the line with superior talent.
Louisville watched that game and figured out the way to beat us was to make us throw it and then beat our blindside coverage to get to Sam. You can see they were clearly coached to go for the fumble rather than the sack. And it worked.
Both of these were based on taking advantage of how our RPO dictates our actions and exploiting observable weaknesses in our blocking personnel
The question is why did the Oline perform so badly? They did a good job against Clemson and FSU, can’t imagine Louisville’s defense is better. We are visiting our daughter at South Carolina and we were at that game, so I didn’t see the game. Kept up with it via live stats and couldn’t believe what I was seeing!🤢I will also continue to wonder why we couldn’t roll Sam away from pressure or run some quick hitters. When your line is getting straight abused, you don’t keep up the same plan. Something has to change. It was rather clear early on that our O line wasn't going to hold them back.
Good point. Wasn't necessarily suggesting that absolves anybody of blame. But it was clearly a game plan that worked over and over again. Idk if it's stubbornness from coaches but I always suspect there's a lot of evidence behind decisions that eludes us as fans.Louisville won their last two games by pressuring the QB and causing turnovers. The plan was not unique to the WF game. WF coaches can also watch tape and see how opponents win games.
The question is why did the Oline perform so badly? They did a good job against Clemson and FSU, can’t imagine Louisville’s defense is better. We are visiting our daughter at South Carolina and we were at that game, so I didn’t see the game. Kept up with it via live stats and couldn’t believe what I was seeing!