• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

MBB Game 19: #19 Clemson Tigers @ LJVM -- Tuesday 9pm - Regional Sports Networks (ESPN+)

bym051d said:
How far away do you have to VPN to not be in the blackout area?
Click to expand...
Chicago had always worked for me in the past, but tonight didn’t work so I did Southern California instead and it worked.
 
NJDeac’22 said:
Ugly, ugly game. I will take an ugly win over a high level loss any day of the week. This team was dragged into a dog fight and came out on top. Hopefully we clean it up on Saturday as that will need to be a more under control game to get the win.
Click to expand...

You and I must have different definitions of ugly. We had 13 assists and only 6 turnovers. Scored almost 90 against the best D in the league. The only ugly part was our free throw shooting. Clemson missed one free throw and we missed 11. Could have really easily been a 15 point beatdown of the previously undefeated league leader. What were you hoping for?
 
Last edited:
That was a great win but I fear the narrative will be about Clemson missed a few important pieces. Just keep winning!
 
Great timeout usage from Forbes. Couple weird lineup moves but nothing too bad. Playing the 3 guard lineup with Davien against a bit physical team was a bit of a head scratcher.
 
UVA will be a true litmus test. Extra day of rest helps.
 
tigerswood said:
Great timeout usage from Forbes. Couple weird lineup moves but nothing too bad. Playing the 3 guard lineup with Davien against a bit physical team was a bit of a head scratcher.
Click to expand...
On the flip side, I kept looking down shocked that Clemson had 3 timeouts until about 2 minutes left.
 
What were we ranked in Kenpom going into tonight? We are at #71 now, which I assume isn’t much upward movement.
 
tigerswood said:
Great timeout usage from Forbes. Couple weird lineup moves but nothing too bad. Playing the 3 guard lineup with Davien against a bit physical team was a bit of a head scratcher.
Click to expand...

I think Forbes was looking for free throw shooting and ball handling with that lineup.
 
We were 73 and favored by 2 or 3 I believe there. Have to think a couple teams around us played well
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top