You've got to think that there's going to be something in the revenue sharing plan that includes being rewarded for beating other P5 opponents in marquee games instead of loading up on Army.
Is there anything you like about Wake?You've got to think that there's going to be something in the revenue sharing plan that includes being rewarded for beating other P5 opponents in marquee games instead of loading up on Army.
It's all about what your neighbor is making. Clemson would be fine with the ACC revenues if S. Carolina was making the same, rather than $40 million more.How the fuck is $60million a year not enough money to run an athletic program where the players aren't paid?
Is there anything you like about Wake?
But if we don't schedule Army to make the Spicy Chili Cheeto Bowl how would we know that Dave Clawson is the second coming of Christ????So the board complains nonstop about scheduling The Army so we can go to shitty bowl games, but I'm the bad guy.
So the board complains nonstop about scheduling The Army so we can go to shitty bowl games, but I'm the bad guy.
"Not for profit institutions of higher education."It's all about what your neighbor is making. Clemson would be fine with the ACC revenues if S. Carolina was making the same, rather than $40 million more.
The thing is nobody cares about the law building and the chancellor knows that. Alumni and their money care about football at these schools. That's why they get the government to pay for academics and the alumni pay for athletics.I’m waiting for the day when a Big Ten Chancellor/President reminds the football coach who owns the brand and takes $30 million in TV money to build a new LAW building.
This. At some point the facilities are all bought and paid for to a similar level. You need to buy the players.If the SEC and Big Ten are smart, they'll figure out a way to launder than TV money into NIL money.
Developing.
Imo Cuse/BC are the two that come to mind, UVA in football would've been an easy answer given their facilities are... terrible.So which athletic departments would be more motivated under a new system than they are right now?
The "G-League" in any scenario is more likely to be remaining P5 conferences whose best players will transfer to the SEC, Big Ten, and ND but who will get the guys who can get on the field in those conferences. That's already happening to some extent but it will ramp up more if the NIL money grows like the TV money.
If the SEC and Big Ten are smart, they'll figure out a way to launder than TV money into NIL money.
If I had to guess it's probably somewhat align with finishing in conference, bowl game revenue(you're probably not getting to a high tier bowl solely by having a crappy OOC), and making NY6/CFPYou've got to think that there's going to be something in the revenue sharing plan that includes being rewarded for beating other P5 opponents in marquee games instead of loading up on Army.
I’ll give you that one as I hate it too but it seems like you go out of your way to shit on Wake and the ACC because you happen to also root for the best team in country who is in the best conference.So the board complains nonstop about scheduling The Army so we can go to shitty bowl games, but I'm the bad guy.