TimmyClutch
Well-known member
Bring on the Ponies. Just my luck I leave Dallas before SMU joins the ACC but I’m still for it. Let’s make the ACC a national brand.
And one of your friends here did WNCW's Saturday Night House Party for 32 years.i had a couple of friends who did frank on Friday for years.
Think of it not as Stanford/Cal taking less money but concessions on what to do with said money.It's not clear from the article/news that came out today, but there may be additional financial concessions this week as compared to last week on the SMU/Stanford/Cal front?
It's not clear from the article/news that came out today, but there may be additional financial concessions this week as compared to last week on the SMU/Stanford/Cal front?
This take makes sense to me. There had to be a conversation with the four no votes to figure out what it would take for each to flip.On the one hand I don't know that even somewhat significant financial concessions really moves the needle as far as WHY State/FSU/UNC/Clemson voted against this in the past two weeks. On the other I'd have to think if they even meet to vote again it signifies something has changed since otherwise they wouldn't even go through the process right? I mean I guess it could just be additional information gathering/convo as a group but whho knows at this point.
This take makes sense to me. There had to be a conversation with the four no votes to figure out what it would take for each to flip.
Or the crowd is extorting big conce$$ions to flip their votes.Yep. Somebody's been working the crowd over. Wake??
Just need to flip one and I think Clemson would be most likely if more money available to pay based on results. Noles, Heels, and Pack wont move because they know they will continue to lose and not be able to increase their share, but Clemson is very confident in a pay for performance and could definitely see them flipping if that pot has increased by however many 10s of millions with the 3 new schools.Or the crowd is extorting big conce$$ions to flip their votes.
UNC’s performance has overall been fine lately as much as we may not want to admit it. They’ve had a couple double digit seasons.Just need to flip one and I think Clemson would be most likely if more money available to pay based on results. Noles, Heels, and Pack wont move because they know they will continue to lose and not be able to increase their share, but Clemson is very confident in a pay for performance and could definitely see them flipping if that pot has increased by however many 10s of millions with the 3 new schools.
In football??? The UnC in chapel hill?? Might want to check your math as hasnt been recently. Did they have a meh year with near losses vs app, Duke, and wf in a miserable coastal? Yes but nothing to hang your hat on with a miserable D year after year.UNC’s performance has overall been fine lately as much as we may not want to admit it. They’ve had a couple double digit seasons.
wow. Clemson licking their chops with Noles, heels and pack a cursing…..ACC stands to make an additional $72 mil annually by adding the 3.
They have been pretty similar to us recently and performance incentives would help us according to Clawson and Currie.In football??? The UnC in chapel hill?? Might want to check your math as hasnt been recently. Did they have a meh year with near losses vs app, Duke, and wf in a miserable coastal? Yes but nothing to hang your hat on with a miserable D year after year.
What’s dumb is that no one would pay the PAC 12 $31 mil per school. Now 8 of the 10 schools will be making that or more.wow. Clemson licking their chops with Noles, heels and pack a cursing…..