• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

2020 Democratic Presidential Nominees

centerdeac said:
What the is wrong with you? You don't think other campaigns had the same type of volunteers? Except Pete's who bothered to learn the system of delegates and campaigned accordingly. Losing four years ago and making the same error on how delegates are counted should be a disquieting to his supporters. Is Bernie going to learn about the electoral college, or spend all his time at college campuses in California to run up the popular vote?

Sociopath and schadenfreude are two different things.

Also temporaily moving to you can caucus is illegal in Iowa. From the SOS web page:

"Your residence for voting purposes is where your home is located. You can only declare one residence for voting purposes.

If you are temporarily away from your home, you do not lose residency for voting purposes." So you are accusing Bernie supporters of voting fraud.
Click to expand...

Are you willfully dim? Of course the other campaigns had the same type of volunteers. This has nothing to do with whether anyone other than Pete "bothered to learn the system of delegates and campaigned accordingly." This is about IDP and/or the DNC straight out manipulating votes, and if it weren't for Chris Schwartz, the Black Hawk County Supervisor, posting the results he directly sent to the IDP less than an hour before the IDP updated its vote count, none of us would have known about it. Democracy dies in darkness.

If you bother to compare the IDP results with Schwartz's, you'll notice that Bernie has 511(!) fewer votes in the official count, Pete has 10 more, Biden has 6 fewer, Warren has 369 fewer, Amy has 114 fewer, Steyer has 369 more, and Patrick has 494 more.

So the biggest people screwed are in descending order: Bernie, Warren, Amy, Biden. It's surely coincidence that the two most screwed by this honest mistake are the two progressives.

People who benefited most in descending order: Patrick, Steyer, Pete.

If they did this for this one county and we only discovered these mistakes by lucky coincidence, this casts serious doubt on the rest of the results. One can not reasonably claim otherwise.
 
Last edited:
It's so exciting that we again get to experience the unhinged rantings of a lunatic on this board. It's been along time since Moonz went bye bye.
 
Last edited:
Keep up the ad hominem attacks Christopher.

Don't take it from me, an "unhinged lunatic." Here's Biden's deputy campaign manager Kate Bedingfield.

 
New results up to 92%. Good update for Bernie. Narrowed the gap in SDE and grew the first ballot gap.

Warren has a nice lead over Biden.
 
Last edited:
Its dumb the errors that they have had.....no conspiracy theories though.
 
Highland Deac said:
The Hill is a right-wing website to boot. Their goal is to create division among Democrats in any and every way possible. Not exactly a reliable source for facts.
Click to expand...

Not a reliable source for facts? You think CNN or MSNBC is a reliable source for facts? Why don't you learn how to think for yourself and judge arguments on their own merits rather than dismissing arguments simply because they come from this source or that source and blindly believing "trusted" sources?
 
PhDeac said:
I still don't get the argument. We lost because Hillary was trying to run up the score on popular votes and she forgot to play the game that could actually win. Pete would prefer to go with the popular vote, but it looks like he actually won Iowa based on how they keep score. Don't we want a nominee who will win the game with the current rules then change the rules to be more democratic?
Click to expand...

Yeah if you’re hung up on electability, but for that matter:

 
No, you have insulted Chris a lot and claimed your own candidate illegally had people fake move to Iowa to caucus. You've displayed a stunning lack of knowledge about who is in charge. In short, you have no credibility to make conspiracy claims.
 
TownieDeac said:
Yeah if you’re hung up on electability, but for that matter:


ITT the Bernie supporter says women and the gays are not electable
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top