PhDeac
PM a mod to cement your internet status forever
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 155,579
- Reaction score
- 22,590
Your points are ridiculous and not based on facts. He's not against M4A. I keep explaining this to you and you're not listening. Pete is rising in the polls with his M4A plan. Polls of Democratic Party voters. You're taking issue with a strategy that's helped him leapfrog Warren and Sanders in the polls with Democratic Party voters.Sorry. One can't be both for and against medicare for all. He's for a public option. He's not for medicare for all. And to pretend that he's just listening to democratic voters and he's doing fundraisers with Merck execs and taking billionaire's money is disingenuous.
Do you think Merck execs are the only ones responding to polls? Polls show people like M4A but don't want to give up their private insurance. Feel free to point out how ridiculous that is just like I did earlier. But don't contest the facts.
Pete is one of the few non-millionaires in the race. You all are portraying him like he's Richie Rich because his dad was a college professor and he went to Harvard. He can't draw from a huge slush fund from an easy blue state Senate/House/Governor race like most of the candidates. As long as we have shitty rules that allow big money to influence campaigns, I have no problem with a candidate without a lot of personal wealth using those rules to help even the playing field with wealthier, well-funded candidates.
Last edited: