TownieDeac
words are futile devices
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 76,189
- Reaction score
- 16,923
Except Warren isn't worth anywhere near $50M. It won't touch a penny of her money.
Wait but I thought it was a sick burn about how rich she was
Except Warren isn't worth anywhere near $50M. It won't touch a penny of her money.
Sure, nominate Pete if you want Trump till 2024.
Wait but I thought it was a sick burn about how rich she was
Only one who stands a chance at beating trump is Biden.
Also let’s set a timer for 30 years from now and check in on Pete’s net worth
Glad this one has been worth watching at least
LOL young poor.
Pete’s net worth is $100K.
Warren’s net worth is $10M.
WTF are we arguing about here?
Is there some super low net worth necessary to qualify a candidate for the support of some here?
That leaves pollsters with two accuracy problems: surveying enough nonwhites and ensuring that sample represents the full array of people of color. They don’t. For instance, none of the qualifying polls has offered the survey in any Asian languages — even though Asian Americans are expected to make up 7 percent of Democratic voters nationally. And with Latinos making up an estimated 17 percent of Democratic voters, all qualifying polls should be available in Spanish.
That’s important. Academic research suggests offering Spanish and Asian languages results in more accurate and representative voter samples. Consider the fact that in 2010, FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver concluded that Nevada polls failed to predict Harry M. Reid’s five-point victory in the Senate race partly because they didn’t offer polling in Spanish and included too few Latinos in their samples.
That’s being repeated. Many 2020 polls are conducted only in English or offer Spanish callbacks rather than immediate options — which results in sampling too few Spanish-speaking voters. As a result, too many of the “mainstream” polls significantly oversample college-educated and higher-income minority voters simply because they’re easier to reach than those with lower socioeconomic status.
If he makes literally 0 money for 30 years and gets a 9% rate of return that’s 1.3M.
If he makes $50k/yr, he’ll be at 8.5.
Any thoughts on who will have more, Warren today or Pete at Warren’s age? I honestly don’t give a shit but if you had to guess?
WTF are we arguing about here?
Is there some super low net worth necessary to qualify a candidate for the support of some here?
But you’re Pete or GTFO?
Yes, people who are successful have a built in advantage in candidacies, particularly presidential, just like attractive people do. I know this truth will shock the delicate sensibilities of some here.