• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

ACC Divisional Realignment

deacs1995 said:
not exactly a ringing endorsement
Click to expand...

Well, a tiny private school has a certain ceiling in terms of major college football ... but Wake seems at least interested in maximizing that ceiling. The problem with the ACC isn't Wake or BC (though you can't have a league entirely of small private schools) it's the bigger schools that run their football programs like they flat out don't give any shits. Syracuse, North Carolina, UVa, etc. Those are the prime fucking offenders.
 
to say unc does care is a bit of a stretch. didnt they create a whole sham department to keep the players eligible? now you can argue they didnt get the desired winning results.
 
The ACC's "two highest ranked teams" idea would seem bad for Wake. After 2006, some of our teams were not good but nonetheless stood a good chance of making the CG with one more victory (wasn't that almost achieved in, what, 2011 vs. Clemson?). Had we won that game, the two highest ranked probably wouldn't have included us.
 
Lohengrin said:
The ACC's "two highest ranked teams" idea would seem bad for Wake. After 2006, some of our teams were not good but nonetheless stood a good chance of making the CG with one more victory (wasn't that almost achieved in, what, 2011 vs. Clemson?). Had we won that game, the two highest ranked probably wouldn't have included us.
Click to expand...

Yeah. That's why I'm fine with flexible divisions especially to counter any plan for the highest ranked teams instead of the teams with the best records.
 
The "highest ranked teams" thing is suggested ONLY to keep teams like Wake/Duke/GT from getting to the championship. They want FSU/Miami/Clemson/VaTech in there year after year
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top