Dunno how Wyoming has insufficient data. Large mammals are everywhere there.
Probably not enough people to kill there.
The CDC does not release statistics when there are fewer than 10 deaths in a state. Probably because it would be too easy to identify individuals.
Wyoming, and other low population states just don't have enough animal caused deaths of people to meet the minimum.
I still have a hard time believing that fewer than ten people die there per year after driving through Central/Western Wyoming. There was cattle everywhere, bison in Yellowstone, elk and deer all over the place, not to mention a few bears. Plus I'd have to imagine people fall off horses regularly.
Lots of animals. Not many people. Also, large animals are much more likely to cause injury than death. If you fall off a horse, the horse isn't likely to kill you. Same with cattle. They may trample and hurt you with their weight, but don't really exert effort to kill.
I was thinking more along the lines of tourists wrecking into cattle or deer at night but you're probably right.
Surprised PA and a few others aren't deer.
Deer don't run over people out in the open. A deer getting hit by a car is very bad for the deer, but the people, while injured, usually survive.
Personally I am 3-0 vs deer when in my vehicles on roads.
And I'm 1-0 v. Deer.
However, no one is posting who lost to a deer.
Surprised PA and a few others aren't deer.
The map is most "unique" way to die, involving an animal - not the most common way to die involving an animal. So if 1,000 people die from a deer incident and 10 die from wasp stings, the map would have wasp on it.