ImTheCaptain
I disagree with you
the consistent conservative point apparently being " well, actually, when you look at the issue it's not at all how we represented it"
Point still stands, I guess.
It’s possible that some individual classroom somewhere did something to justify nationwide sweeping bans of discussing history. Junebug will dig it up.
I’m heartened that at least a dyed-in-the-wool libtard like yourself agrees that what the school did here violated the constitution.
That argument was rejected by the court, you donk.
He was required to confess it to the teacher, and the acknowledgment would have been in writing for other school administrators to see.
the school board meeting lasted 11 hours?
I’m heartened that at least a dyed-in-the-wool libtard like yourself agrees that what the school did here violated the constitution.
So we've gone from the conservative argument that these state laws are just a big nothingburger and a chance for liberals to be drama queens, to there is a real threat in education that has to be addressed and eliminated. Sounds a lot like the rationale for restrictive and cumbersome laws to eliminate voter abuse that never find more than a tiny handful of cases nationally every election year.
yeah i mean, i just posted that part because it's fucking annoying to have to read an article to get context that everyone was wondering
Yeah, only getting one side on a contentious issue is pretty annoying
“I identify as….”
“There are oppressive/oppressed or privileged/unprivileged aspects of these identities…”
The horror.
he says, defending the canceling of teaching kids about slavery
Link?