I agree that winning is a bigger factor. I also agree that building the sports performance center isn't going to all of a sudden cause us to start beating out Kentucky for basketball recruits or Alabama and Clemson for football recruits. That wouldn't happen. But having it would do more than "sway a recruit here or there". I really believe it would make more of a difference. If you were to take a football recruit on a tour of the football facilities today what would you show them after Deacon Tower? Would you show them the weightroom? Or the locker room at Bridger? If a recruit is being recruited by two comparable programs in many cases they seem to go with the one with the better facilities.
Aside from the fact that I left the Deacon Club during the bz tenure after 20+ years and that I'll never give another penny as long as Wellman is at Wake, I fundamentally disagree with the whole arms race thing with athletics. It never stops and it's never enough. There is always a new project - always a reason to ask for more and more money. I guess that's the world we choose to be in and I do like Wake competing at the highest level, so it's probably not a reasonable attitude - I have it nonetheless.
Trying to understand both points - both are valid.
Bottom line, our current weight room would be bad as of High School standards. That isn't going to cut it in the ACC.
dook can do it. So can Wake.
We can get a new weight room easily with all the money that will be pouring in from the ACCs success in the NCAA basketball tourney, no?
Strick, when was the current weight room built?
Strick, when was the current weight room built?