Shooshmoo
Well-known member
I thought you said your tongue was in your cheek when you were talking about KA's? Which is it?
It was, initially, then Bob 2 spewed more BS and I thought about it some more.
I thought you said your tongue was in your cheek when you were talking about KA's? Which is it?
Good work! Only halfway to go.
So says you and David Duke. Congrats. Just so we're clear, I happen to disagree with you and the other separate but equal segregationists.
so you don't understand the term "discriminatory" then
Sure. And I understand you, shoo, and other politically correct lunatics defending this are segregationists- just like David Duke.
Frats are generally prohibited from school policy (at least) from discriminating on the basis of race. There is a big difference in offering housing to frats and providing housing to students of color that is open to everyone.
Steering students into segregated housing, called Halisi Scholars Black Living-Learning Community, is discriminatory even if the housing is technically open to all races. That's open and shut.
Steering students into segregated housing, called Halisi Scholars Black Living-Learning Community, is discriminatory even if the housing is technically open to all races. That's open and shut.
The person who named the dorm, for one.
The argument otherwise wouldn't pass the straight-faced test in a court of law. Can you imagine if BOA had a loan called "Loan for White People"? That would be steering and discriminatory, just like naming a dorm the "Black Living-Learning Comminity" is steering and discriminatory. It's not close.
The argument otherwise wouldn't pass the straight-faced test in a court of law. Can you imagine if BOA had a loan called "Loan for White People"? That would be steering and discriminatory, just like naming a dorm the "Black Living-Learning Community" is steering and discriminatory. It's not close.
It wasn't called "Loan for White People," but the FHA basically allowed that until 1968.
If this is illegal, then I'm sure a federal judge will agree with you at some point in the next two years.
You're just wrong. Naming a dorm "Black Living-Learning" has the purpose of creating all-black housing, even if it is technically open to white students. I mean, the name was in response to black students' demands for segregated housing. How is this debatable?
No, i'm not wrong, you just disagree with me.
And we were talking about steering. Just identifying a building for a community purpose is not the same thing as "oh, you're a black student? here's where the black students live and they don't live elsewhere"
So "steering" is now acceptable. I must have heard wrong.
labeling a building is not 'steering'