harmoniousmonk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2017
- Messages
- 4,054
- Reaction score
- 54
assuming this is a legit link, care to summarize for those who dont want to create a login?
Los Angeles Times: 'Tip of the iceberg': More charges expected this month in college basketball scandal. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIw9_LspzY
One former high-major college coach who retains deep connections in the business said he believes the case will lead to 40 to 50 job openings for head and assistant coaches by the spring.
Already, some coaches at schools not linked to the first round of charges have retained attorneys.
I've been wondering why Arizona and Miami haven't gotten more scrutiny so far. We pretty much know that those two schools were directly tied to a bidding war for Nassir Little. It seems like Miller and Larranaga should be catching a lot of heat right now.
Most who plead out will be hit with a show cause ban for several years. The NCAA won't take the bad publicity going along with letting coaches who pled to federal crimes coach within another few years.
What world do you live in? The NCAA is the epitome of bad publicity, it doesn't matter. UNC is still playing sports. Miami is caught up in this, as they have with virtually every other scandal yet are still playing. Baylor still rolls along. Penn State is a top-5 team. Urban "Cell Block C Warden" Meyer spouts off about doing things the right way. Louisville is Louisville, again. The NCAA (like the NFL) prints money, they don't give two shits about bad publicity as long as their product justifies their TV contracts. Banning a large number of coaches hurts them a hell of a lot more than any temporary bad publicity that goes along with letting them coach.
How many of these cases have included a wide-spanning USAO investigation with double digit federal indictments?
I'll hang up and listen.
You're correct that we lost to OSU in the NCAA tournament one year.