First of all, one can "remain under oath." I've heard judges utter those words at least a hundred times. Second, ...
Also, Hillary herself has expressed doubt at the letter affecting the election:
Link
Are we talking about July or October here?
No, what you say later cannot be considered perjury. It could subject one to perjury, but that's not related to what we're discussing here.
What does a judge have to do with congressional testimony and DOJ rules?
And how could Comey truthfully say those emails were pertinent when he had no idea of the content?
You went to church on a Saturday? Sounds fishy.
Sorry, it was June 9th. I checked quickly and misread the date:
JUN 09 - 196821:08:28Went to Sunday morning service @First Methodist Church; wore solid black outfit with black sweater in memory of Robert F Kennedy
He didn't say they were pertinent. He said they didn't know and they were investigating. The point of his letter was to correct his testimony that she was no longer being investigated and that the investigation had concluded.
It's absolutely relevant. The DNC manipulated the process to nominate a corrupt, shit candidate and now we're stuck with Donald Fucking Trump.
I can never trust anything you say again. You are no better than townie.
Jesus Christ. The letter to Congress specifically says the emails appear to be pertinent. It's a direct quote.
Lol. Blame the Dems for who the Republicans nominated? That's a new one
Followed by, "Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant..."
But feel free to keep distorting the context. My fault for mixing up "pertinent" and "significant" without double checking first.
Here's the actual text of the letter.
Followed by, "Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant..."
But feel free to keep distorting the context. My fault for mixing up "pertinent" and "significant" without double checking first.
Here's the actual text of the letter.
so why send the letter at all, then?
Followed by, "Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant..."
But feel free to keep distorting the context. My fault for mixing up "pertinent" and "significant" without double checking first.
Here's the actual text of the letter.