spiffylubes
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2011
- Messages
- 916
- Reaction score
- 57
Christ dude, just change the fucking channel and watch sports on ANOTHER CHANNEL.
I kind of thought the point of the 30 at 30 series was to highlight and examine stories which occurried during ESPN's existence. The important parts of her story all happened in the 70's before ESPN came into existence. And it's not like ESPN was at all relevant in its early days.
It's ESPN Films now. Not 30 for 30.
Well that's some bullshit. I don't think they've done 30 films yet. We got shortchanged. There should have been one about the scoreboard play.
Why stop there, why not stick it on Animal Planet?
I saw some of the Crossfit Championships to determine "the worlds most fit person" on espn2 last night. Holy shit those chicks were IN SHAPE. And one or two even looked kind of hot, but maybe that was the magic of tv...might be a different story in person.
watched the last half. It was interesting. My takeaway was transgendered people are dealt a really, really shitty hand in life and I hope my kids never have to go through that. Nobody wakes up one day and says "hey I want to try out life as the opposite sex", you have to be deeply, mentally convinced that you were born in the wrong body, and that has got to be enormously difficult to live with.
What I don't understand when people say things like this is why does the degree to which they are convinced of the idea change whether or not it is a good or bad idea? Many humans have been convinced, at a deep deep level, of any number of things that are terrible ideas.
We are talking about physical self-mutilation here. The altering of the body at a fundamental level. What is it about sexuality that makes people think that we have to be hands off and say it makes sense?
If someone told me that they were deeply convinced that they should have been born a lizard (this person exists, and really did this) and they subsequently get intense body altering surgery to be physiologically closer to being a lizard, why is that any different? Perhaps the most ironic is when people cite it as some kind of "accepting who you are" change when you are effectively rejecting the body you were born with.
Why are we not pressing these people to deal with the idea that their mental compulsion may be completely wrongheaded? It's akin to the people who alter their intestinal structure to lose weight rather than work on the idea that maybe their deep mental compulsion to eat is actually the problem.
It's definitely an interesting and loaded topic.
Also, if any of you watched Katelynn on the Real World/Road Rules challenge you would realize that its not that big of an advantage to formerly be a man. She was by far the worst female contestant.