• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Facebook Gold from Crazies

cookoutdeac said:
Uh oh, Junebug is gonna be pissed:

R.J.-Cyler.jpg


The old blue ranger:

grid-cell-13499-1427474709-0.jpg
Click to expand...

 
Junebug said:
There is specific EEOC guidance that says sex can be a BFOQ for acting roles. So a studio can insist that Stella be a woman. There is, however, no BFOQ for race. So a studio may not insist that Stella be black. Seems odd, but that's the law -- a studio violates the law, for example, by categorically excluding whites from the role of MLK.

Unless the employee is seriously obese, so much so that the obesity could be considered a disability, there are no federal employment laws that protect fat people. Even for the seriously obese, there is no way that an employer can legitimately avoid the ADA simply by calling a waitress an "actor." Hooters may try, but if you know someone who was denied a job on that basis you should tell them to talk with an employment lawyer.
Click to expand...

Thx for the answer.
 
Junebug said:
There is specific EEOC guidance that says sex can be a BFOQ for acting roles. So a studio can insist that Stella be a woman. There is, however, no BFOQ for race. So a studio may not insist that Stella be black. Seems odd, but that's the law -- a studio violates the law, for example, by categorically excluding whites from the role of MLK.
Click to expand...

But don't AASAC guidelines suggest that some BFOQ attributes are subject to GDOC requirements as well (specifically for acting/casting as opposed to say hiring faculty at a religious institution)? I don't know the case law off hand, but precedent extends back at least as far as when the EEOC was headed by LBJ.
 
Only if you realize it applies to cops as well.
 
OMG, on second thought, don't read this, avalon.

Here are 7 ways you can discipline your wife if a gentle rebuke does not work:
[h=3]#1 For Disrespect[/h]If your wife is speaking in disrespectful and demeaning ways in public in front of others (whether this is toward you or others) this might require a public rebuke of her tone and actions.
[h=3]#2 For Overspending[/h]If your wife is spending money against your wishes – this may require confiscation of her credit cards and ATM cards. Of course this can be done in measured amounts. Perhaps you might just take away one or two cards that she has abused and if her spending continues to get out of control you would move toward removing the ATM card as well. This does not necessarily mean she would have no money, but you could give her a cash allowance each week.
[h=3]#3 For failing to care for your children or contradicting your authority with your children[/h]If your wife is failing to do her duties as a mother toward your children or she is continuing to contradict your authority with the children then perhaps you might put off buying that new car for her and have her continue driving her older car for a while as long as it is safe for her to drive. If you have to purchase another car – you could downgrade the type of car she will be able to get or buy her a used one instead. Maybe you put off the purchase of that new dishwasher she has been wanting.
[h=3]#4 For too much TV watching[/h]If your wife is watching too much TV you could cancel the cable or satellite TV and just have antenna service.
[h=3]#5 For too much online time [/h]If your wife is spending too much time online (like Facebook or other social outlets or online shopping) then if she does not respond to your warnings about this you could change your internet code on your router so that her devices will not have access to the internet.
[h=3]#6 For neglect of the home[/h]Maybe your wife is not watching too much TV or spending too much time online but she is still neglectful toward her duties in your home. If your wife is being neglectful of her duties to care for your home then you might put off that new living room furniture set you have been talking about or those new window dressings she has been wanting.
[h=3]#7 For sexual denial[/h]If your wife is un-submissive in the sexual arena and chronically denies your sexual advances (without legitimate medical or psychological reasons for doing so) then perhaps that upcoming trip you were going to take her on gets canceled. Maybe that wardrobe upgrade your wife was looking forward to gets downsized or canceled. The Bible says a man has to supply his wife with clothing, but it does not say it has to be the expensive clothing she wants!
Some of these disciplinary procedures may affect the family as a whole, but sometimes it is necessary to do this in an attempt to bring your wife to repentance.
These are just some examples of non-abusive ways that a Christian husband can discipline his wife in a way that honors God and his design for the home.
 
YES! When my (hypothetical) wife is not obeying my authority, all I've got to do is not buy her that dishwasher she's been wanting! that'll do the trick.

Or maybe withhold some sweet clothes, or change the internet router code. Perfect.
 
Honestly, the fact that that website even exists is disgusting. fuck that.
 
wakephan09 said:
Honestly, the fact that that website even exists is disgusting. fuck that.
Click to expand...

JuiceCrewAllStar said:
omg

http://www.christiandomesticdiscipline.com/warmup.html
Click to expand...

That seems kind of fetishy, frankly. While that's not my cup of tea, as long as both parties are entering into a relationship willingly (and have the ability to leave) ... not going to judge them too much. There's plenty of secular relationships with similar dynamics involving power play / discipline / etc (hell, 50 Shades made a $TEXAS based on similar themes).

Whatever floats your boat and all that.
 
Junebug said:
There is specific EEOC guidance that says sex can be a BFOQ for acting roles. So a studio can insist that Stella be a woman. There is, however, no BFOQ for race. So a studio may not insist that Stella be black. Seems odd, but that's the law -- a studio violates the law, for example, by categorically excluding whites from the role of MLK.
Click to expand...

wakephan09 said:
But don't AASAC guidelines suggest that some BFOQ attributes are subject to GDOC requirements as well (specifically for acting/casting as opposed to say hiring faculty at a religious institution)? I don't know the case law off hand, but precedent extends back at least as far as when the EEOC was headed by LBJ.
Click to expand...

lol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top