For a guy involved in the literary business one would think you could read and comprehend what was written. My post theorizes that at some point if CA, used as example, insists on punishing another state (by restricting teams from playing in that state) only because the state has a different view of things than CA, at some point it is likely to be reciprocal. Is CA going to stop shipping CA produce to Kansas? Seems like they would to be consistent in their reasoning.
It's not "different views". It's about discrimination. It looks like we're coming back to where it all started with Brown.
The state of CA doesn't own farms. It's private business owners. Your comment about selling produce makes as little sense as discriminating against gay people.