Baller Deac
Member
Ph, you just said absolutely nothing.
This
Ph, you just said absolutely nothing.
OK. For those who can't understand what I said, if you have a good young PG who gets better every year, don't worry about not having "top 15" guy since the gap from "Top 15" to high 20s or so isn't that big.
Just browsing some rankings, Schroeder seems to fall in the mid to late teens.
Possible hot take here, but I think the PG position is so stacked that any franchise continually looking for a top 15 PG is fooling themselves. I think there are a few elite all-time great PGs (CP, Russ, Harden, Steph), PGs who are really really good (Lowry, Wall, Dame, and others) and a lot of PGs who are either really good or have potential to be really good (Teague, IT, Kemba, etc). The rest are solid or not that good. There's nothing wrong with a 30 team league in which almost every team has a capable PG. Just get a PG who can pass and defend and get an advantage at another position instead of risking just having a god awful PG.
The only position that matters is the 3. Cause the gap between them and everyone else is so wide. Lebron, Kawhi, Durant are the best 3 players in the league. Followed by Giannis, Hayward, Paul George, Melo. That's your top 7 in PER.
After that: Rudy Gay, Michael Beasley, Danillo Gallinari, Otto Porter, Tobais Harris, Harrison Barnes, TJ Warren, Shabazz Muhammad.
What
So you are saying that there are about 15 PGs that are at least really good. Seems like if you want to win in the NBA having one of them would be important.
Schroeder is barely at replacement level. Most advanced metrics don't rate him as a starting quality PG. I just can't ever see him being "really good" absent a massive leap. For JC's sake in the short term I hope I'm wrong.
Giving up on a good young PG to chase getting a game changer (one of 4 players who play on 3 teams now) is a bad move.
Ph knows PGs
OK. For those who can't understand what I said, if you have a good young PG who gets better every year, don't worry about not having "top 15" guy since the gap from "Top 15" to high 20s or so isn't that big.
Just browsing some rankings, Schroeder seems to fall in the mid to late teens.
Giving up on a good young PG to chase getting a game changer (one of 4 players who play on 3 teams now) is a bad move.
He's saying it's a bigger advantage to play an elite player at SF than PG. Seems like a Bucks fan would understand this.
I understand Plama; I don't understand your "top 15" "top 20" PG arg.
He's saying it's a bigger advantage to play an elite player at SF than PG. Seems like a Bucks fan would understand this.
I thought the Bucks had an elite PG, not an elite SF.
There are a lot of good to great PGs.
So many diamonds in the Summer League that you wish you had on your team:
John Collins
D Mitchell
P Siakam - where did he come from?
Diallo
B. Forbes
Taureen Prince
Thornwell
Ojeleye - oops, he's NBA ready, should have drafted him
Marqueese Chriss
And yes, tarhole Kennedy Meeks looking efficient as he did in the tourney, unfortunately