dartsndeacs
THE quintessential dwarf
It wasn't wanton. Russia has had interests in the Ukraine for 60 years and someone overthrew their interests and they acted accordingly. Kinda like we did in the 1860's. Should we give NC back?
It wasn't wanton. Russia has had interests in the Ukraine for 60 years and someone overthrew their interests and they acted accordingly. Kinda like we did in the 1860's. Should we give NC back?
It wasn't wanton. Russia has had interests in the Ukraine for 60 years and someone overthrew their interests and they acted accordingly. Kinda like we did in the 1860's. Should we give NC back?
All empires fall, even ours. Especially if we try to hold others down. Crimea has the population of New Mexico. Pretty dumb fight to involve yourself in. Especially if you aren't willing to actually back it up with anything but threats of taking away money. Thanks, Obama.
NC was never a sovereign nation nor was it granted independence voluntarily by the US government.
A better example might be giving back the Gadsden Purchase lands.
It is even clearer that you have no idea what you are talking about by comparing the Russian-Ukraine conflict to the Civil War.
Russia violated Ukraine's sovereignty while the south (part of the United States of America) was seceding from the Union (as part of the USA still, not a sovereign nation).
Those are completely different things.
But we all know that Russia expected to keep its relations and have access to the places it needed militarily as part of their willingness to "give it" away. Once a revolution threatened that, they acted, as we would.
If a nation we currently have bases located on all of the sudden decided to not give us access anymore, how would we act?
you mean if they violated signed treaties and broke contracts? probably appropriately.
No they aren't, because Russia always expected Ukraine to keep giving them what they needed. It was sovereignty on paper, not effective sovereignty... clearly.
So we should just ignore what Russia does (cede it to another sovereign nation) and just go on "what we all know" as a barometer for negotiations?
And so when the revolution happened in Ukraine, do you think Russia believed their treaties and contracts were going to hold up?
You know when bkf talks about fuggin millennials who pretend to know things, here is an actual example of that.
But we all know that Russia expected to keep its relations and have access to the places it needed militarily as part of their willingness to "give it" away. Once a revolution threatened that, they acted, as we would.
If a nation we currently have bases located on all of the sudden decided to not give us access anymore, how would we act?
Instead of finding out, they broke international law and annexed crimea and invaded ukraine. so, we'll never find out.
Well it seems like in retrospect your choices were between hurting a group of people the size of New Mexico or according to you threatening the lives of 4 billion people on this planet by us electing a madman.
So you pick, can't have both.
The whole point of the revolution was to break those treaties, so they started a coup. Kinda like y'all are supporting being done to our president, so I can understand how you sympathize.