• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

MBB Game 8: Rutgers at WF - Wednesday 6 pm ACCN

Pilchard

Well-known member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
17,191
Reaction score
6,469
Our 4-3 #74 Deacs host the Rutgers Scarlet Knights this Wednesday. Here is a quick take on RU:

Rutgers 5-2 #63: The Scarlet Knights have proven to be a bully, beating up on 5 weak teams (no win over a team rated better than #175), but the Knights could not keep up against their two top 100 opponents, losing by 7 to #51 Princeton (BTW, Princeton is 8-0, and may be favored in every game the rest of the way) and an embarrassing 18 point home loss to #16 Illinois this past Saturday (Rutgers just doesn't lose like that a the RAC). As always, Rutgers' calling card is defense (#12 in KP), but they struggle to score (#178 in offense). The analytics (man.... Rutgers shooting stats are nauseating) :

Offense:

Effective FG%: 45.9% #296
TO%: 16% #99
3 PT%: 30.4% #265
2 PT%: 46% #290
FT%: 64% #311


Defense:

Effective FG%: 42.6% #11
TO%: 25.3 #6

3 PT%: 32% #137
2 PT%: 39% #4

Rutgers is also elite at blocking shots (#6), steals (#40), while not fouling much #66 in opponent's FTA per FGA. Rutgers is incredible at stopping the break and forcing the opponents to extend possessions (#4 in opponents longest possessions). As discussed below, Rutgers has been unable to keep teams off the offensive glass.

Roster:

Last time out (76-58 RU lost to Illinois), no Scarlet Knight players scored in double figures; here were the starters:

5-11 Sr. Noah Fernandes: Wichita State/UMASS transfer: 8ppg; 32% from three; 2nd on team in assists; tied for first in steals; horrible game against Illinois 54 "0" rating
6-3 So. Derek Simpson: athletic; 10 ppg; leads team in assists 6 for 11 from three on the season (21% last year)
6-6 Sr. Aundre Hyatt: started at LSU; leading scorer: 12 ppg; 5 rpg; 31% from three
6-9 So. Antwone Woolfolk: former football player: 6 ppg 4 rpg; no threat from three; 64% from the field
6-11 Sr. Cliff Omoruyi: three year starter; elite shot blocker (#6 in the nation in block percentage); no threat from three; 53% from two; 58% from the line; 11 ppg 9 rpg

Off the bench:
6-4 Sr. Austin Williams: Hartford transfer; 9 points 4 rpg 3 assists against Illinois; 1 for 4 from three on the season
6-8 Fr. Gavin Griffiths: highly rated recruit; scored 25 against BU; 10 ppg; 32% from three
6-2 Fr. Jamicheal Davis: 4 ppg; 3 rpg; 3 assists per game; 29% from three;

Roster note: Mawot Mag was a key player for the Knights last year until he tore his ACL. In 2023, RU went 16-7 with Mag in the lineup; 3-8 without him. Mag is expected back at some point this year, but probably not on Wednesday.

The Projection:
KP: WF 71 RU 69
Torvik: WF 70 RU 68

These two teams are opposites. WF's strength is offense (#54), but the Deacs struggle with defense (#122); Rutgers is a horrendous shooting team and struggles to score (#178 on offense), but they are among the best on defense (#12). Protecting the ball is huge for WF as if Rutgers can't turn WF over; Rutgers is helpless in the half-court; the Deacs aren't a great rebounding team (#293 in offensive rebound percentage), but curiously, RU is weak at preventing 2nd shots (#303 in opponents rebound percentage: Illinois killed Rutgers on the glass this past Saturday, outrebounding Rutgers 55 to 27 (not a misprint)). So, getting some 2nd chance points would be big for the Deacs. This is RU's first true road game (the first time the Knights leave the lovely State of NJ this season; in fact, Wednesday's game is the only game Rutgers will play in the first two months of the season (13 games) outside of the Garden State.

Would lean WF and the under. WF under Forbes have been good at home; Rutgers has historically struggled on the road, and this will be Rutgers first road game of the season (think that hurt Florida last week). That said, Rutgers will try to make this game as ugly as possible, and this will be the best defensive team that the Deacs have faced this year.
 
Last edited:
Feels like good defense and bad offense teams have tended to beat us in recent years. Because as bad as their offense might be, our bad defense tends to cure it.

Hoping I'm wrong on that, as this is a really important one to win to keep a halfway-decent OOC resume.
 
This one is there for the taking, I'm talking a 15-20 point win. RU is not good, if we can get out to a lead they will be hard pressed to get back into it.

Agree. A good start is important. Don't want to be playing from behind against a team that plays solid defense.
 
If anyone is looking to get rid of 2 tix, please let me know. If not, I will just go through the tix office.
 
Last year we were no match for Rutgers.
 
Yeah they stifled us.
Hopefully playing at home helps, Rutgers is a tough place to play. What little I've seen them this year, they appear pretty athletic, so taking care of the ball and letting them get into transition will probably be important.
 
Hopefully playing at home helps, Rutgers is a tough place to play. What little I've seen them this year, they appear pretty athletic, so taking care of the ball and letting them get into transition will probably be important.
Their former football player sounds like a freaking load.
 
Reid is certainly going to help but Rutgers is going to still come after us physically. We have to be prepared to match their aggressiveness with some of our own. Don’t back down, be strong with the ball and attack…make them pay. We have struggled against teams like this under Forbes. Time to turn a corner tonight
 
Reid is certainly going to help but Rutgers is going to still come after us physically. We have to be prepared to match their aggressiveness with some of our own. Don’t back down, be strong with the ball and attack…make them pay. We have struggled against teams like this under Forbes. Time to turn a corner tonight
Agreed. Rebounding and turnovers will be determinant but Reid should help a lot with at least the first.
 
This is all Reid’s first game in who knows how long. He’s not gonna be Embiid the second he steps out there.
 
This is all Reid’s first game in who knows how long. He’s not gonna be Embiid the second he steps out there.
last game he played in was March 25th, so 256 days since he played
 
Back
Top