TownieDeac
words are futile devices
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 76,189
- Reaction score
- 16,925
Romo is a better QB than a lot of starting QBs and that's why he's still starting for the Cowboys.
Probably only 8-12 people in the world I'd rather have quarterbacking my team next year than Romo. Excellent player. For next year only I'd definitely take him over Stafford, Kaep, Cutler types.
If he is in the 10-15 range like you say, that's not excellent. It's soundly mediocre.
Yeah, the Eagles are going to pad their stats this weekend. Top rushing attack in the league versus a defense that couldn't stop a guy on crutches. A defense ranked 9th in INTs against a QB who can't sleep at night unless he's thrown at least two per game. Or quarter. Bears go down in Philly and fucking Cutler steals another paycheck.
Romo is far better than mediocre. He's a pretty damn good player. I would put him #7 or #8 probably in the league.Romo is what he is. A mediocre QB. If he didn't play for America's Team, nobody would care about him.
Do you consider your avatar mediocre?
Romo is far better than mediocre. He's a pretty damn good player. I would put him #7 or #8 probably in the league.
He throws up numbers and my fantasy team thanks him for that. But he's not clutch and QBs are judged by their ability to be clutch. I'd put him in that 10-15 category, but that's where young, promising QBs reside. He's too experienced to be there.
He throws up numbers and my fantasy team thanks him for that. But he's not clutch and QBs are judged by their ability to be clutch. I'd put him in that 10-15 category, but that's where young, promising QBs reside. He's too experienced to be there.
I'm biased for. I'm a lifelong Cowboy hater. I love that they keep trotting him out there every year only to fall apart at the end.