Louisville opened as a 6.5 dog... Now down to 5.5.
I won't be wagering, but that seems like a lot of points and an overreaction to week 1 results for both Louisville & UCF.
Also just noticed that Louisville's next 3 games are: @UCF, vs FSU, vs USF. That just seems odd.
Lean L'ville, but it's really tough to take them after Cuse just mauled them. This is a revenge game for UCF, and I'm not sure Satterfield really wants to stay in L'ville. A team that is far less than the sum of its parts.
Was about to take UCONN getting a ton of points hosting Cuse, expecting a Cuse letdown. Also, Cuse has a thin roster and lost quite a few players during the L'ville game, but UCONN lost its starting QB, and the back up was terrible against a bad FCS team last week. Pass.
Going to keep taking Duke unders until the linemakers catch up to the fact that Elko is a defensive guru. In addition to "coaching up" the defense, Elko has really slowed Duke's pace on offense (Cutcliffe tried to play up tempo last year with disasterous results). Duke @ NW U56. Similarly, looking at VT unders with Pry as coach and a crappy QB. Also, BC o-line is terrible. BC @ VT U46. Also on GA State +7.5, and UNLV +13 (should never take West Coast teams that I rarely follow; due to lack of knowledge, easy to fool yourself and think you have angle when you don't because you don't know the teams; that said Cal got outgained by UC-Davis last week, and benefitted from a misleading final. Cal has no home field advantage, and while they have played crappy foes, UNLV seems improved.
Took WF at -7. Knew the line would jump with the Hartman news, but can't believe its 13 (or more) now. WF is much better, but Hartman just started practicing and am a little concerned that he might not be fully on. Fighting the urge to take the 6 point middle.