I mean the fired coach buyouts are essentially about doing the math of how much more the profitable the program would be if a winning coach was installed instead of a losing one. And based on school's willingness to fire coaches, they are either horrendous at doing that math, or college football is pretty damn profitable if you have a winning program.
I'd counter that it's a meaningless financial risk for the school. It usually results in the AD getting fired though, so it's not really a meaningless risk for the individual decision maker. But otherwise, yeah.
Pretty damn sorry with a staff of no telling how many coaches, trainers and support staff, players can be smoking weed right before a game.
Yeah the ACC also had to sit back and take it when their broadcast partners just absolutely shit on their basketball teams all season such that it created a narrative that helped leave the team with COY and POY out. But heaven forbid they were to talk bad about the Ess Eee See. Hell, they still think the Big 10 will fuck them if they host Gameday there even though that conference cut them out.
Wake. Better QB.
I honestly think NIL is going to be bad for a lot of places with money. Having some 18 year old kid making 2 mil while some other starter makes nothing is going to make for some weird dynamics that aren’t great for building a team and playing like a team.
I’ll go with 4-2 Iowa.
