oh man, BobStackFan really had his finger on the pulse of what is real and what is fake in this world.Going back and re-reading the first few pages of this thread was really interesting.
here is a better explanation of the Russian hacking than anything our board lefies have posted in years
hint: Putin too was surprised that Hillary didn't win,
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ant-as-warning-to-clinton-former-ag-says.html
Here’s more from the affidavit, which can be hard to read because of Butina’s poor written English. In that March 24 email, she proposed to this American contact of hers something she called “Project Diplomacy.” The GOP, she wrote, is “traditionally associated with negative and aggressive foreign policy, particularly with regards to Russia. However, now with the right to negotiate seems best to build konstruktivnyh relations.” The email mentioned her ties to the NRA and the prominent role the NRA plays in Republican politics. It concludes by requesting $125,000 so she could attend “all upcoming major conferences” of the Republican Party.
here is a better explanation of the Russian hacking than anything our board lefies have posted in years
hint: Putin too was surprised that Hillary didn't win,
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ant-as-warning-to-clinton-former-ag-says.html
Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election may have been meant more as a warning to Hillary Clinton about Moscow’s capabilities than an earnest bid to boost then-candidate Donald Trump, former U.S. attorney general Michael Mukasey argues.
In a piece published in the Wall Street Journal, the former AG for the George W. Bush administration speculated that Russian President Vladimir Putin never thought Trump would win the election and instead wanted to “send a warning” to Clinton that Russia could have information from her hacked personal email server.
you can believe what you want but in the end the version in the fox/wsj article will be shown to be a lot closer to the truth than what the left currently claim
we all know the answer to that...it feeds his Clinton derangement syndromeThat speculation from Mukasey is UNVERIFIED, DAMNIT! How the FUCK can you rely on that, you HGToH?
In sailor’s world, if you play a game you think you’ll lose, it’s just a warning. You weren’t actually trying so if you do win, you didn’t try to win.
Granted, I haven't followed this as closely as I should have, but is sailor saying in post 7623 that Russia absolutely meddled in the 2016 Presidential election? Because when I was last tuned in, the conservatives/right on this board and Twitter were saying that it didn't happen.
Are the goalposts currently, "it did, but what Russia was trying to do was intimidate Hillary."?